• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    C

    Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica,Dutch Research Council

    EST. 1946
    195论文总数
    3,919引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Pablo Cesar
    Pablo Cesar
    Delft University of Technology;Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
    论文:31引用:0H-index:0
    Abdallah El Ali
    Abdallah El Ali
    University of Amsterdam
    论文:21引用:0H-index:0
    Peter Boncz
    Peter Boncz
    MotherDuck;Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica;Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;TU Munich;LDBC LTD
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Marten Van Dijk
    Marten Van Dijk
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut;Department of Computer Security, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica;Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    论文:10引用:0H-index:0
    Jack Jansen
    Jack Jansen
    Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
    论文:10引用:0H-index:0
    Irene Viola
    Irene Viola
    Centrum Wiskunde Informatica Amsterdam Netherlands
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0
    Tanja Alderliesten
    Tanja Alderliesten
    Medical Center, Leiden University
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Peter A. N. Bosman
    Peter A. N. Bosman
    Department of Software Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Thomas Röggla
    Thomas Röggla
    Centrum Wiskunde Informatica Amsterdam Netherlands
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0

    论文(195)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1MultiPRIDE at EVALITA 2026: Overview of the Multilingual Automatic Detection of Slur Reclamation in the LGBTQ+ Context Task.
    Chiara Ferrando, Lia Draetta, Marco Madeddu, Mae Sosto,Viviana Patti,Paolo Rosso,Cristina Bosco, Jacinto Mata, Estrella Gualda
    2026International Workshop on Evaluation of Natural Language and Speech Tools for Italian(2026)引用:17
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2SemEval-2026 Task 9: Detecting Multilingual, Multicultural and Multievent Online Polarization
    Usman Naseem, Robert Geislinger, Juan Ren, Sarah Kohail, Rudy Garrido Veliz, P Sam Sahil, Yiran Zhang, Marco Antonio Stranisci,Idris Abdulmumin,Özge Alaçam,Cengiz Acartürk, Aisha Jabr,

    We present SemEval-2026 Task 9, a shared task on online polarization detection, covering 22 languages and comprising over 110K annotated instances. Each data instance is multi-labeled with the presence of polarization, polarization type, and polarization manifestation. Participants were asked to predict labels in three sub-tasks: (1) detecting the presence of polarization, (2) identifying the type of polarization, and (3) recognizing the polarization manifestation. The three tasks attracted over 1,000 participants worldwide and more than 10k submission on Codabench. We received final submissions from 67 teams and 73 system description papers. We report the baseline results and analyze the performance of the best-performing systems, highlighting the most common approaches and the most effective methods across different subtasks and languages. The dataset of this task is publicly available.

    2026International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation(2026)引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3On Admissibility in Post-Hoc Hypothesis Testing
    Ben Chugg,Tyron Lardy,Aaditya Ramdas,Peter Grunwald

    The validity of classical hypothesis testing requires the significance level alpha be fixed before any statistical analysis takes place. This is a stringent requirement. For instance, it prohibits updating alpha during (or after) an experiment due to changing concern about the cost of false positives, or to reflect unexpectedly strong evidence against the null. Perhaps most disturbingly, witnessing a p-value p << alpha vs p = alpha - & varepsilon; for tiny & varepsilon; > 0 has no (statistical) relevance for any downstream decision-making. Following recent work of Gr & uuml;nwald [1], we develop a theory of post-hoc hypothesis testing, enabling alpha to be chosen after seeing and analyzing the data. To study "good" post-hoc tests we introduce Gamma-admissibility, where Gamma is a set of adversaries which map the data to a significance level. We classify the set of Gamma-admissible rules for various sets Gamma, showing they must be based on e-values, and recover the Neyman-Pearson lemma when Gamma is the constant map.

    2026INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING(2026)引用:6
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4On Zeros and Algorithms for Disordered Systems: Mean-Field Spin Glasses
    Ferenc Bencs,Brice Huang, Daniel Z. Lee,Kuikui Liu,Guus Regts

    Spin glasses are fundamental probability distributions at the core of statistical physics, the theory of average-case computational complexity, and modern high-dimensional statistical inference. In the mean-field setting, we design deterministic quasipolynomial-time algorithms for estimating the partition function to arbitrarily high accuracy for all inverse temperatures in the second moment regime. In particular, for the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model, our algorithms succeed for the entire replica-symmetric phase. To achieve this, we study the locations of the zeros of the partition function. Notably, our methods are conceptually simple, and apply equally well to the spherical case and the case of Ising spins.

    2026Symposium on the Theory of Computing(2026)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends
    Sabine Weber, Angelina Wang, Ankush Gupta,Arjun Subramonian,Dennis Ulmer, Eshaan Tanwar, Geetanjali Aich, Hannah Devinney, Jacob Hobbs, Jennifer Mickel, Joshua Tint, Mae Sosto,

    Natural language processing (NLP) technologies are rapidly reshaping how language is created, processed, and analyzed by humans. With current and potential applications in hiring, law, healthcare, and other areas that impact people's lives, understanding and mitigating harms towards marginalized groups is critical. In this survey, we examine NLP research papers that explicitly address the relationship between LGBTQIA+ communities and NLP technologies. We systematically review all such papers published in the ACL Anthology, to answer the following research questions: (1) What are current research trends? (2) What gaps exist in terms of topics and methods? (3) What areas are open for future work? We find that while the number of papers on queer NLP has grown within the last few years, most papers take a reactive rather than a proactive approach, pointing out bias more often than mitigating it, and focusing on shortcomings of existing systems rather than creating new solutions. Our survey uncovers many opportunities for future work, especially regarding stakeholder involvement, intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and languages other than English. We also offer an outlook from a queer studies perspective, highlighting understudied topics and gaps in the harms addressed in NLP papers. Beyond being a roadmap of what has been done, this survey is a call to action for work towards more just and inclusive NLP technologies.

    2026CoRR(2026)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 195 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    阿姆斯特丹大学合作论文 21
    代尔夫特理工大学合作论文 20
    莱顿大学合作论文 12
    阿姆斯特丹自由大学合作论文 11
    卡内基梅隆大学合作论文 7
    乌得勒支大学合作论文 7
    慕尼黑工业大学合作论文 7
    埃因霍温理工大学合作论文 7
    鲁汶大学合作论文 6
    奥尔登堡大学Carl von Ossietzky合作论文 5

    机构统计