• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    BMC anesthesiology

    BMC anesthesiology

    JournalISSN 1471-2253eISSN 1471-2253中科院 医学 3区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(4618)

    排序
    1Analgesic Efficacy of Uni-Level Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Basma M. El-Khalifa, Hamza Khelifa, Mahmoud Mohamed Gad, Jamal Ahmad, Hazem M. Mazy, Asmaa Soliman, Eman Ayman Nada, Bahaa Elfakharany, Tarek H. Elmeneizee, Israa Ahmed Qutob

    Surgery remains the cornerstone of management in breast cancer patients. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), have emerged as adjuncts to standard therapy for postoperative pain control. Studies comparing ESPB and standard procedure of general anesthesia and opioids were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesia duration, and postoperative morphine consumption. VAS pain scores were significantly reduced with the ESPB group. Similarly, longer analgesia duration (MD 7.03, 95

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2A Neuro-Symbolic Clinical Decision Support System for Chronic Pain Management Using Structured Derivation Traces, Adaptive Compute, and Knowledge Graph Constraint Checking: Comparison with 30 Physicians from Pain-Relevant Specialties
    Mete Ucdal, Evren Ekingen, Ali Niyazi Kurtcebe

    Chronic pain management requires complex multidisciplinary reasoning integrating pharmacological, interventional, rehabilitative, and psychosocial approaches across multiple guideline frameworks (International Association for the Study of Pain [IASP], American College of Rheumatology [ACR], European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology [EULAR], American Academy of Neurology [AAN], American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine [ASRA], and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]). Large language models (LLMs) show promise in clinical reasoning but lack any mechanism that records whether encoded guideline criteria were matched, are susceptible to hallucination, and cannot provide auditable decision chains—critical limitations where polypharmacy risks, opioid safety, and nuanced pain mechanism classification (nociplastic vs. nociceptive vs. neuropathic) demand the highest decision rigor. Some classical neuro-symbolic (NS) systems offer formal guarantees, yet such systems are heterogeneous and can lack contextual flexibility. We present PainNS-Prove, a guideline-provable neuro-symbolic clinical decision support system for chronic pain. We evaluate non-inferiority against 30 board-certified physicians from three pain-relevant specialties (10 anesthesiologists and algologists, 10 PM R specialists, and 10 rheumatologists), all in active chronic pain practice across 30 expert-validated clinical vignettes. The five-stage pipeline integrates Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-4.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro: (1) multi-LLM structured chain-of-thought with pain-specific prompting, (2) knowledge graph constraint checking against a Neo4j pain ontology (52,418 nodes; 203,672 edges), (3) structured derivation-trace generation with a Lean 4-inspired rule engine, (4) adaptive compute allocation, (5) screening of factual claims via multi-source triangulation, designed to prevent unsupported content from reaching the output. Statistical analyses included non-inferiority testing (δ = 5

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Nebulized Lidocaine for Preventing Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Major Abdominal Surgery
    Li Yang,Yan Chen,Lei Wu,Zhanqi Zhao,Zhiyong He,Jun Zhang

    Despite the lung-protective ventilation strategy, high incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major non-cardiac surgery remains a major concern in the perioperative care due to high morbidity and mortality. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative nebulized lidocaine on PPCs in major abdominal surgery. Adults scheduled for major abdominal surgery were enrolled and randomised 1:1 into two groups from June 6, 2025, to January 23, 2026, and final follow-up was in January 30, 2026. Patients in the intervention group received nebulized lidocaine twice: once immediately after anesthesia induction and again before the end of surgery, with 100 mg of 2

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Viscoelastic and Transfusion Effects of Residual Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit Blood Reinfusion after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mehmet Akif Yilmaz,Muhammed Enes Aydin, Nuray Uzun, Dilara Akcal Oksuz,Ahmet Murat Yayik,Erkan Cem Celik, Mehmet Zübeyir Güney,Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu,Ali Ahiskalioglu

    Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with perioperative blood loss, coagulation disturbances, and increased allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements. This study evaluated whether postoperative reinfusion of residual CPB circuit blood reduces allogeneic RBC transfusion requirements and affects rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters. This single-center, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolled 60 adults aged 18–70 years undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting with CPB at Atatürk University Research Hospital from April 2023 to April 2024. Participants were allocated 1:1 by computer-generated simple randomization to residual CPB circuit blood reinfusion (n = 30) or no reinfusion (n = 30). Patients, clinicians responsible for postoperative transfusion decisions, outcome assessors, and data analysts were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was allogeneic RBC transfusion requirement from the end of surgery until intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Secondary outcomes included ROTEM parameters, chest tube drainage during the prespecified periods (0–4 h, cumulative 0–24 h, 24–48 h, and 48 h to ICU discharge), ICU length of stay, laboratory values, and in-hospital complications. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. P values for the 20 between-group ROTEM comparisons were adjusted using Holm’s step-down procedure. The study was funded by Atatürk University Scientific Research Project Coordinator (TTU-2023-12558). All 60 patients completed follow-up and were analyzed (30 per group). The median volume of circuit-derived autologous blood reinfused was 625 [505–875] mL. RBC transfusion requirement was lower in the reinfusion group than in the control group (1 [0–2] vs. 2 [1–3] units; p = 0.030). After Holm adjustment for 20 ROTEM comparisons, FIBTEM clotting time was the only parameter that remained significantly different between groups and was longer in the reinfusion group (71 [66–77] vs. 65 [61–67] s; unadjusted p = 0.001; adjusted p = 0.020). The INTEM/HEPTEM clotting time ratio was higher in the reinfusion group (1.08 [1.03–1.09] vs. 1.02 [1.01–1.03]; unadjusted p = 0.010), but this difference was not statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted p = 0.190). Chest tube drainage during the prespecified periods (0–4 h, cumulative 0–24 h, 24–48 h, and 48 h to ICU discharge) and ICU length of stay were similar between groups. Postoperative reinfusion of residual CPB circuit blood was associated with lower allogeneic RBC transfusion requirements in this small trial. No between-group difference in chest tube drainage was detected, and no re-exploration for bleeding occurred in either group. FIBTEM clotting time was longer in the reinfusion group; the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. Larger studies are needed to confirm the transfusion findings and assess potential harms. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06824753; retrospectively registered on 11 October 2024.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Preprocedural Ultrasound-Assisted Midline Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in Older Patients: is There an Advantage over the Conventional Landmark-Guided Paramedian Technique? A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sameh Ben Ahmed, Ibtissem Ben Taleb, Mohamed Amine Jmal, Chaima Debabi, Emna Dhaouadi,Becem Trabelsi, Mechaal Ben Ali

    Preprocedural neuraxial ultrasonography improves the technical performance of spinal anesthesia, and ultrasound-assisted paramedian approaches may be particularly efficient. However, the paramedian technique requires a distinct entry point and needle trajectory that may be less familiar to some operators, whereas the midline approach remains familiar and widely used. Whether preprocedural ultrasound can enhance this familiar midline strategy compared with landmark-guided paramedian puncture in older patients remains uncertain. In this single-center randomized trial, 110 patients aged ≥ 65 years were allocated 1:1 to landmark-guided paramedian (PML) or preprocedural ultrasound-assisted midline (MUS) continuous spinal anesthesia for hip-fracture surgery. The primary outcome was needle passes. Secondary outcomes included insertion attempts, first-pass success, identification and procedure times, complications, and puncture level. Between-group comparisons used Mann–Whitney U, χ², or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Needle passes were lower with MUS than PML (2 [1–3] vs. 3 [2–5]; Hodges–Lehmann difference, − 1 pass; 95

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 4618 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Daniel I. Sessler3667
    Robert Stolker3374
    Boerma E Christiaan3373
    Vellinga Namkje A R3373
    Hinnerk Wulf33113
    S. E. (Sanne) Hoeks3292
    Christian Putensen3279
    Yuguang Huang32421
    Andrea Cortegiani3155
    Reimer Riessen3112

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Yuguang Huang32421
    Xiangyang Guo22219
    Hassan Mohamed Ahmed19916
    Dongxin Wang22016
    Yi Feng15016
    Rehena Sultana24515
    Tianlong Wang13413
    Manlin Duan9913
    Ban Leong Sng23013
    Hinnerk Wulf33113

    相关期刊

    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
    Minerva anestesiologica
    Journal of Anesthesia
    Korean journal of anesthesiology
    British Journal of Anaesthesia
    Anesthesia and Analgesia
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
    European Journal of Anaesthesiology
    Anesthesiology
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica