• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Information Processing in Agriculture

    Information Processing in Agriculture

    JournalISSN 2214-3173eISSN 2214-3173中科院 农林科学 1区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(608)

    排序
    1AquaLytic: Closed-form Species-Incremental Learning for Acoustic Fish Feeding Intensity Recognition in Aquaculture
    Ying Xiao,Tan Wang, Liang Wang,Tomas Norton,Meng Cui
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Automated Prompt Engineering Framework for the Precise Delineation of Agricultural Boundaries Via Zero-Shot Segment Anything Models
    Hassan Afzaal,Aitazaz A. Farooque,Arnold W. Schumann, Gurjit S. Randhawa, Brad Dunnington, Travis J. Esau,Qamar U. Zaman
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Early Warning of Litchi Anthracnose Through Temporal Feature Fusion of Environmental and Plant-Response Data
    Jianqiang Lu, Zhengyang Zhou, Haiyang Tong,Yubin Lan, Ting Wang,Weixing Wang
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Reproducible Reliability Benchmarking for Crop–weed Visual Perception under Dataset Shift
    Shuhao Liu, Zhuo Chen, Jie Liu, Zhi Ling,Yu Yan

    Agricultural crop–weed visual models are commonly evaluated within a single dataset, whereas practical model selection requires evidence across datasets, annotation policies, image conditions, and inference constraints. We present a reproducible reliability benchmark for weed-presence classification, crop/weed detection, and semantic segmentation using CropAndWeed and PhenoBench as primary datasets, with CWFID and CWD30 providing external diagnostic evaluation. The study combines an auditable, task-aligned annotation-harmonization protocol with bidirectional transfer and retention analysis, calibration and selective prediction, controlled image-condition stress, uncertainty, seed stability, subgroup analysis, and batch-1 inference reference. Evaluation across these dimensions revealed direction-dependent transfer and separated models with similar source-domain performance according to confidence quality and image-condition sensitivity. In a representative detection setting, a source-domain mAP50–95 of 0.669 corresponded to a target-domain score of 0.409, equivalent to 61.1% retention, while Gaussian blur radius 7 reduced the source-domain score to 0.298. Post-hoc temperature scaling improved ECE and Brier score in 8 of 12 classification cases. External diagnostics further identified visual, annotation, and task differences that materially affect transfer. The resulting evidence base supports agricultural model selection using transfer behavior, confidence quality, stress sensitivity, and computational cost alongside source-domain accuracy.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5A Feedforward Model Predictive Controller for Path Following of Autonomous Tractors in Paddy Field
    Zhiqiang Yao, Yinghu Cai,Boyi Xiao,Marco Ezio Pezzola, Claudio Maroni, Elisabetta Leo,Long Qi,Xiao Feng

    The integration of autonomous driving technologies into tractors marks a major step forward in modern farming, improving efficiency and precision. However, slippery terrains like paddy fields present challenges that require reliable path-following algorithms to handle uncertainties and nonlinear dynamics. In this study, an enhanced path following control methodology is proposed through the integration of feedforward compensation with model predictive control (FFC-MPC) for autonomous tractors operating in low-adhesion paddy fields. The proposed algorithm integrates soil-induced lateral slip effects to adjust the wheel steering angles, with the objective of minimizing trajectory tracking errors. To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm, comparative assessments were conducted within a multi-body dynamic simulation framework. Additionally, field tests were performed to evaluate the performance of the algorithm in the real-world operating conditions. The results demonstrate that, during straight-line trajectory tracking, the proposed FFC-MPC algorithm achieves a 64.6% reduction in tracking error relative to the model-independent pure pursuit control (PPC) algorithm and a 35.5% reduction relative to the model-based Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) approach. In more complex scenarios involving curved and transitional path segments, the FFC-MPC algorithm achieves an 86.8% reduction in tracking error compared to PPC and a 55.8% relative to LQR. The performance enhancements improve the efficiency and stability of autonomous tractors in paddy fields and show potential for broader application in other high-slip environments.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 608 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Arun K. Misra8541
    Vijai Singh8541
    Xi Qiao6637
    Tianhai Wang4902
    Yanzhou Li4902
    Liu Yadong4891
    Hongkun Tian4891
    Hong-Wei Xiao4702
    Lawrence C. Ngugi4282
    Qian Zhang4262

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Saadat Kamgar1888
    Yang Wang1397
    Daoliang Li2007
    Seyed Mojtaba Shafaei1677
    Xi Qiao6637
    Xueqian Fu1916
    Weizheng Shen1946
    Lav R. Khot1176
    Longsheng Fu2326
    Huaibo Song655

    相关期刊

    Biosystems Engineering
    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
    Precision Agriculture
    Journal of Agricultural Engineering
    International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
    Applied Engineering in Agriculture
    INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering
    AGRIENGINEERING
    Journal of Biosystems Engineering
    Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture