• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Journal on Educational Technology

    Journal on Educational Technology

    Journal

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(763)

    排序
    1地域の大人との対話が中学生のキャリア意識に与える影響の分析 ライフキャリア・レジリエンスと自尊感情に着目して
    ,
    2021
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2セルフ・ハンディキャッピングとハーディネスを用いた社会人学生の類型化と成績・学習時間との関係
    Yasunori Nakamura,
    2021
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3都道府県の形をイラスト化しても,イラストを面白おかしくしても,都道府県の名称は覚えられない
    2021
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Academic Staff Perspectives on an Institution-Wide Shift to Active Blended Learning
    Virginia Teixeira Antunes,Alejandro Armellini,Robert Howe

    This study identified barriers and enablers of a university-wide pedagogic shift to Active Blended Learning (ABL). ABL is an approach to learning and teaching that promotes student centredness through teaching in small groups, with a focus on sense-making activities and interactions in and outside the physical or virtual learning space. Data gathered through a survey of academic staff, followed by in-depth interviews, were analysed using thematic analysis. The normalisation and effective embedding of digital technology and small group teaching were two major enablers of pedagogic transformation to ABL. Inconsistent teaching practices and the lack of student engagement with learning activities emerged as two of the main barriers. An in-depth understanding of effective, student-focused higher education teaching is a cornerstone of large-scale pedagogic change processes. Recommendations are put forward for higher education institutions considering changes to their learning and teaching strategies.

    2021
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5SMART WELFARE: THE WORK OF THE EDUCATOR AT THE TIME OF COVID-19
    Elena Gabbi,Cristina Gaggioli,Maria Ranieri

    The field of socio-educational services is focused on the value of relationships, proximity, support and intervention on site, at home or in users’ facilities, and all those elements are difficult to convert digitally. Nevertheless, during the period of the Covid-19 pandemic, smart working also became part of the everyday life of social educators. This study discusses the role of technology in the work of the educator during the pandemic period and possible future developments. The study offers an insight into the influence of Covid-19 on socio-educational services, focusing on the function of technology both in maintaining contact with the users where the service was suspended and in reshaping the assistance that continued to be provided. The research study highlights that, despite the challenges and the initial disorientation faced by educators, digital technologies can constitute important working tools to assure the continuity of the pedagogical relationship also in the socio-educational and care contexts.

    2021
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 763 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Chih-Hsiung Tu2481
    Neil Selwyn2323
    Demetrios Sampson1873
    Jeannette M. Wing1791
    Alexandra Cristea1776
    Paloma Diaz1641
    Gerd Wagner1641
    Miltiadis D. Lytras1641
    Angie Parker1581
    Michael B. Eisenberg1561

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Vittorio Midoro8313
    Luigi Filippo Sarti710
    Francesca Pozzi259
    Guglielmo Trentin349
    Donatella Persico38
    Michela Ott17
    Tatsuya Horita1197
    Kanji Akahori1396
    Alexandra Cristea1776
    Stefania Manca156

    相关期刊

    Educational media international
    International journal of information and education technology (IJIET)
    Contemporary educational technology
    Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society
    Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology
    Pedagogical Research
    International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research
    Journal of Education and Practice
    Technology, Knowledge, and Learning
    Journal of Education and e-Learning Research