East European Neo-Marxism is an important part of the twentieth-century Neo-Marxism. As the international influence of East European Neo-Marxism is growing, an overall understanding of its theory is essential to studies in this field. The so-called overall understanding should no be limited to the surface of the theory. Rather than seeing it as a sort of positivist knowledge or instrumental theory, we have to delve into the critical field in reality opened up by this theory and reveal its historical features and critical understanding about social reality. Therefore, this article studies the Problematic of East European Neo-Marxism, as well as the three dimensions of its problematic consciousness, through the organic combination of the "logic in reality" and the "logic in theory" in wishes to put its basic theoretical features and value orientation in perspective.

There are two basic types of theories of life-world in modern times:one is the theory which takes directly life-world as its main subject,another is the theory which penetrates and grasps human existence and the mechanism of human socio-historical development through the analysis of the machanism and cultural schema of life-world.The first one may be called typical theory of life-world,like the theories of Edmund Husserl,Arthur H.Lefebvre,Jürgen Habermas,Agnes Heller,and so on.The second one can be described as untypical theory of life-world,like Kolakowski's,which is often contained in postmodern theories,micro politics,micro historics and other social scientific thoughts.The one dimension of Kolakowski's critique of everyday life is to located the analysis of philosophical problems on the basis of everyday life or life praxis and,in that way,to make the philosophical thinking away from pure abstraction and speculation.Through the concrete analysis of everyday life and everyday thinking,the other dimension lies in the effort to make the everyday existence get rid of givenness and take-for-grandedness,and to make everyday subjects into self-conscious and self-reflexive existence condition.

过去30多年中国学术界的新马克思主义研究,无论对于我们推动基本理论创新,还是丰富我们关于当代人类社会现实的深刻理解,都具有重要的价值。在新的历史条件下,我们应当在三个方面进一步拓展和深化新马克思主义研究:挖掘深度,从开疆拓土式的"初耕耘"到多维度的"精耕细作";开阔眼界,从"以我为主"的解读模式到国际比较视野的全面开启;直面现实,从注重新马克思主义的"理论逻辑"到凸显它的"现实诉求"。

博士研究生思想政治理论必修课《中国马克思主义与当代》教学大纲的编写,是深刻认识马克思主义中国化最新成果,正确分析当代世界重要问题以及全面了解中国特色社会主义丰富实践的过程。该课程的教学目的是帮助大学生树立马克思主义世界观和方法论,增强世界眼光和战略思维,坚定走中国特色社会主义道路的理想信念。《大纲》是作为教学指导和依据,在实际教学过程中,还需要充分发挥教师和学生的主动性、创造性,以提高教学质量。

<正>今天,我们在这里召开座谈会,庆贺新版《马克思画传》、《恩格斯画传》和《列宁画传》正式出版发行,研究如何在新形势下学习和利用马克思主义经典文献,对深入贯彻落实党的十七届六中全会精神,促进社会主义文化大发展大繁荣,深

<正>文化建设是一个复杂的体系,既包括文化的物化形态,也包括文化的价值形态,二者密切联系又相互区别,其中,价值形态建设是文化建设的根本任务。党的十七届六中全会进一步提出增强国家文化软实力,标志着文化建设真正

There have been a lot of important progress and achievements in the area of study of the human science in China in past several years.The theoretical self-consciousness of the human science is derived from the cultural self-consciousness of human existence,which is to comprehend human existence and development in the view of cultural progress and transformation.And the achievements in this area should be attributed to the transformation of philosophical paradigm from traditional consciousness philosophy to praxis philosophy.In the new socio-historical condition the greater and more important theoretical break-through and progress in the human science depend on the break-down of the methodological shackle of pure speculative philosophy,that is,the philosophical research should be focused on the historical,as well as realistic cultural plenteousness of human existence.

《中国马克思主义与当代》导论对大纲的主要目标、时空定位、核心概念进行系统说明。对于什么是中国马克思主义、如何理解"当代"、如何从中国立场出发,增强世界眼光和战略意识、如何通过教学,提高学生理解和运用中国马克思主义的能力等问题进行了深入阐述。导论的讲授过程,也是理解大纲基本目标、教学要求以及基本思路的过程。

文化是人们的生活样法,可以从三个层面来解释。文化模式是沉淀在人们生活方式之中的稳定性特征,与民族生存居住的地理环境、日常生活的样态等高度相关,如中国的经验文化、日本的耻感文化和西方理性文化等。在我国建设文化强国的过程中必须克服现代性带来的负面影响。大学的功能在于"守望"和"引领",而大学的使命在于文化——文化的传承、文化的启蒙、文化的自觉和文化的创新。

<正>新时期马克思主义理论研究和建设工程的实施,推动哲学社会科学对中国特色社会主义理论进行了全方位的研究,取得了丰硕的成果。但是,从目前我国发展所面临的复杂的国内外形势和艰巨的任务来看,当前我们的马克思主义理论研究还面临着很大的挑战和考验,其中突出的问题有两方面:一是我们关于中国社会发展的研究虽然已经取得丰富的成果,但是,这些研究还比较多地限于"中国向度",

<正>关于"中国模式",现在主要有三派观点:一种是认为已经形成了模式;一种认为根本没这个模式;还有一种认为这种模式在成长。我认为有模式,但目前而言,我认为不必急于拿出一个结论说"中国模式"是什么。问题在于,中国道路和中国模式的基本内涵和世界意义尚未清晰地提炼出来,远未达到自觉。造成这种状况的原因是双重的:从内在的原因来看,我们的理论研究还存在着局限性,有时在强调"中国特色"时忽略了

<正>何谓"文化自觉"?即一个民族达到文化的自我觉醒,自我反省,自我创建。我们党是用马克思主义先进理论武装的、具有高度理论自觉的政党,同时也是具有高度文化自觉的政党。一方面,我们党站在人类社会历史发展的高度,深刻认识和把握文化在历史进步中的重要地位和作用,把握文化发展的规律和先进文化的前进方向,把文化作为人民群众的根本需求、民族凝聚力和创

经过几代翻译家近百年的不懈努力,我国巳成为世界上翻译出版马克思主义经典著作最多、最全的国家.我们所翻译的著作文本具有系统性和完整性,所表达经典著作的思想理论观点具有全面性和可靠性.这些高质量的编译成果为我们党的理论创新提供了源源不断的思想资源、理论基础.百年经典著作编译事业以著作文本的中国化为马克思主义理论的中国化奠定了坚实基础,做出了突出贡献:一是保证理论立场的坚定和理论基础的牢固；二是推动理论研究不断走向深入和全面；三是有助于理论传播和宣传教育的广泛深入.进入新世纪,马克思主义经典著作编译工程,将以更精深、更丰富的编译成果进一步彰显经典著作编译事业的版本研究意义、文本研究意义和思想研究意义,为中国马克思主义的理论创新,为中华民族伟大复兴提供不竭的源头活水.

已过"而立之年"的<求是学刊>,带着丰硕的成果和骄人的荣誉,迎来了发刊第200期的重要时刻.作为<求是学刊>一直的读者、20多年的作者,特别是曾经8年的编者,我不仅为她日积月累的成果和荣誉而高兴,更为她矢志不渝的精神特质而感动,这就是:对真理不懈的求索和对学术品位不变的坚守.

国外马克思主义研究在过去20多年间取得了突出的进展,但也存在着研究领域膨胀过快、边界不确定的问题。为了推动这一领域的健康和深入发展,应当培养一种＂划界意识＂：一是应当对国外马克思主义研究所涉及的各种流派、人物和观点的客观的学术影响力和现实影响力做出扎实的评估,从而突出重点和核心层;二是应当进一步对每一具体研究对象的价值取向、基本观点做出具体的区分性评价,从而区分关于国外马克思主义流派的研究与关于马克思思想在当代思想界和社会实践中影响的研究。同时,还要突出国外马克思主义研究的＂现实诉求＂,把关于不同理论流派和理论观点的内在理论逻辑的揭示与关于这些理论同特定时代人类实践的现实逻辑关系的揭示有机结合起来。

The relations between Marxist socio-historical theory and contemporary socio-historical reality should be a special focus for deepening the study of Marxist socio-historical theory in our times.Marx's doctrines are strongly practical in nature;historical materialism is a revolutionary and practical socio-historical theory which is not only committed to revealing the general laws of the socio-historical movements of human society but also displays creativity and value in confronting socio-historical reality.Compared with the era when Marx and Engels' socio-historical theory was established,today's socio-historical reality has undergone significant changes with regard to inner structure,mode of operation,development implications and problems and dilemmas.Therefore,historical materialism needs to consciously improve,enrich and transform its research perspectives,models and theoretical paradigms in order to deal with contemporary socio-historical reality more vigorously and effectively.In a context in which great changes have taken place in the inner structure and mode of operation of socio-historical reality,it will be difficult for Marxist socio-historical theory to establish real relations with current social reality if we fail to employ diversified micro-level interpretations and narratives to supplement and perfect the grand theoretical paradigm of historical materialism.

Lukacs criticizes many times his own philosophical theory due to political pressure.Are these self-criticisms strategies to compromise with the political environment,or due to its own theoretical reasons? Based on a holistic observation of his academic career,this article analyzes the constant concern about a cultural home of Lukacs and its transformations in different periods.

<正>改革开放以来,虽然我们已经不断融入全球化的进程中,但是,总体上看,在相当一段时间,我们是相对独立地、韬光养晦地、稳定地推进我们的经济、政治、社会、文化的发展,我们的马克思主义中国化理论研究的着力点和各级领导干部的关注点也更多地投向"中国特色"。然

Like many other great philosophers,Lukacs reflects and criticizes his own philosophical theory completely in his late years.This criticism is embodied in the study of aesthetics,ethics as well as ontology,aiming at one of his important achievements in his early years and the most influential works—— History and Class Consciousness,which shows the theoretical dilemma in his late years.