No improvement in neurocognitive outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY(2010)
摘要
The popularity of off-pump (beating heart) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was initially stimulated by numerous theoretical benefits including tower incidence of stroke and neurocognitive dysfunction. With a postoperative stroke rate of less than 1% for elective CABG, it has been very difficult to demonstrate any significant differences in this outcome between techniques. However, changes in neurocognitive function are more common in the postoperative setting and thus provide greater power for demonstrating improvement with changes in surgical technique. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether there were significant differences in neurocognitive outcomes in patients after undergoing off-pump versus on-pump CABG. A database search for prospective randomised controlled trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG in any language was conducted. Eight trials incorporating 892 patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for reporting of neurocognitive outcomes, and were able to be included in this meta-analysis. Sufficient data were available across the seven studies to combine results for five neurocognitive tests (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning, Grooved Pegboard, Trait A and B, and Digit Symbol). Overall there were no convincing differences in outcomes in neurocognitive testing between off-pump and on-pump CABG groups. The results of this meta-analysis show that there are no significant neurocognitive benefits when comparing off-pump versus on-pump CABG. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
更多查看译文
关键词
meta-analysis,neurologic manifestations,coronary artery bypass,off-pump
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例

生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn