Functional differences between heme permeases: Serratia marcescens HemTUV permease exhibits a narrower substrate specificity (restricted to heme) than the Escherichia coli DppABCDF peptide-heme permease.

Serratia marcescens hemTUV genes encoding a potential heme permease were cloned in Escherichia coli recombinant mutant FB827 dppF::Km(pAM 238-hasR). This strain, which expresses HasR, a foreign heme outer membrane receptor, is potentially capable of using heme as an iron source. However, this process is invalidated due to a dppF::Km mutation which inactivates the Dpp heme/peptide permease responsible for heme, dipeptide, and S-aminolevulinic (ALA) transport through the E. coli inner membrane. We show here that hem TUV genes complement the Dpp permease for heme utilization as an iron source and thus are functional in E. coli. However, hem TUV genes do not complement the Dpp permease for AI.A uptake, indicating that the HemTUV permease does not transport ALA. Peptides do not inhibit heme uptake in vivo, indicating that, unlike Dpp permease, HemTUV permease does not transport peptides. HemT, the periplasmic binding protein, binds heme. Heme binding is saturable and not inhibited by peptides that inhibit heme uptake by the Dpp system. Thus, the S. marcescens HemTUV permease and, most likely, HemTUV orthologs present in many gram-negative pathogens form a class of heme-specific permeases different from the Dpp peptide/heme permease characterized in E. coli.