The role of ultrasonography in the detection of adrenal masses: Comparison with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Y. Suzuki, I. Sasagawa,H. Suzuki,T. Izumi,H. Kaneko, T. Nakada

International urology and nephrology(2001)

引用 24|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
To compare detection rates of adrenal tumors by ultrasonography,computed tomography and magnetic resonance image, we studied 61patients with adrenal tumor, who underwent adrenalectomy. In 45(73.8%) of the 61 patients, adrenal tumor was detected by ultrasonography. However, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging could detect all adrenal tumors. All adrenal tumors measuring more than 3.0 cm in diameter were detected by ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance image. When adrenal tumors were smaller than 3.0 cm, however,ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correctly found adrenal tumors in 30 (65.2%) and 46(100.0%) of 46 patients and 30 (100.0%) of 30 patients,respectively. These facts suggest that ultrasonography seems to be an effective diagnostic procedure for the prevention of overlooking adrenal tumors larger than 3.0 cm.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Adrenal tumor,Ultrasonography,Computed tomography,Magnetic resonance imaging
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要