Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is both safe and effective in a district hospital

Introduction Functional operations of the gastrointestinal tract are ideal indications for minimal-access surgery. The aim of this paper was to assess the safety and potential benefits of the laparoscopic Ramstedt pyloromyotomy using the experience of a single surgeon in a district general hospital. Methods 90 consecutive infants underwent pyloromyotomy: 35 open procedures and 55 laparoscopic procedures. This is a retrospective study but the operative data of the laparoscopic group were collected prospectively. Results There were no differences in demographic data between the groups. The open group had a shorter mean operating time, 22.14 min, than the laparoscopic group, 26.04 min ( p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the time to full feed between the two groups ( p = 0.076). 62.9% of the infants in the open group vomited compared with only 43.4% in the laparoscopic group ( p = 0.058). The laparoscopic group had shorter postoperative stay, 62.33 hours, compared to 91.89 hours ( p = 0.001). There was one reoperation in each group: for complete wound dehiscence in the open group and for incomplete myotomy in the laparoscopic group. Conclusions Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) is as safe as the open procedure and has the potential benefits of shorter hospital stay and improved cosmesis.