Mental stress and ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure]

The aim of this study was to validate the use of arithmetical mental stress testing as an indicator of an abnormal subject's response to stress in general. For this purpose 82 males (mean age 31 +/- 7 years, mean body surface area--BSA--1.76 m2), free from cardiovascular disease, underwent mental stress testing. In the sample examined we found 13 so-called reactive subjects, (mean age 32 +/- 7 years, mean BSA 1.8 +/- 0.1 m2), who during the test showed increases in mean blood pressure (greater than 20%) greater than mean values of the whole sample (17.8%). In any case blood pressure was higher than 150/100 mmHg. These data were compared with those of 15 subjects (mean age 32 +/- 4 years, mean BSA 1.77 +/- 0.1 m2) randomly selected among those, whose mean pressure increases were not higher than 17.8% (mean increase within sample). The 2 groups underwent blood pressure ambulatory monitoring and submaximal bicycle test. In reactive subjects, values of systolic (PAS) and diastolic pressure (PAD) were significantly higher than in controls (p less than 0.001) during blood pressure ambulatory monitoring, with a greater variability of such values as can be seen from the higher standard deviation (PAS 121 +/- 19 mmHg vs PAS 113 +/- 13 mmHg; PAD 82 +/- 11 mmHg vs PAD 75 +/- 10 mmHg). During ergometric testing, blood pressure trend was similar in the 2 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)