Optimal differentiation of high- and low-grade glioma and metastasis: a meta-analysis of perfusion, diffusion, and spectroscopy metrics

Neuroradiology(2016)

引用 74|浏览18
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction To perform a meta-analysis of advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics, including relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (nADC), and spectroscopy ratios choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and choline/N-acetyl aspartate (Cho/NAA), for the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas (HGG, LGG) and metastases (MTS). Methods For systematic review, 83 articles (dated 2000–2013) were selected from the NCBI database. Twenty-four, twenty-two, and eight articles were included respectively for spectroscopy, rCBV, and nADC meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, we calculated overall means for rCBV, nADC, Cho/Cr (short TE—from 20 to 35 ms, medium—from 135 to 144 ms), and Cho/NAA for the HGG, LGG, and MTS groups. We used random effects model to obtain weighted averages and select thresholds. Results Overall means (with 95 % CI) for rCBV, nADC, Cho/Cr (short and medium echo time, TE), and Cho/NAA were: for HGG 5.47 (4.78–6.15), 1.38 (1.16–1.60), 2.40 (1.67–3.13), 3.27 (2.78–3.77), and 4.71 (3.24–6.19); for LGG 2.00 (1.71–2.28), 1.61 (1.36–1.87), 1.46 (1.20–1.72), 1.71 (1.49–1.93), and 2.36 (1.50–3.23); for MTS 5.06 (3.85–6.27), 1.35 (1.06–1.64), 1.89 (1.72–2.06), 3.14 (1.57–4.72), (Cho/NAA was not available). LGG had significantly lower rCBV, Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA values than HGG or MTS. No significant differences were found for nADC. Conclusions Best differentiation between HGG and LGG is obtained from rCBV, Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA metrics. MTS could not be reliably distinguished from HGG by the methods investigated.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Brain tumor, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging, Meta-analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要