谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Local Control Rates of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (rcc) to the Bone Using Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: is Rcc Truly Radioresistant?

Practical radiation oncology(2015)

引用 58|浏览9
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose: We report the radiographic and clinical response rate of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone lesions treated at our institution.Methods and materials: Forty-six consecutive patients were included in the study, with 95 total lesions treated (50 SBRT, 45 CF-EBRT). We included patients who had histologic confirmation of primary RCC and radiographic evidence of metastatic bone lesions. The most common SBRT regimen used was 27 Gy in 3 fractions.Results: Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-64 months). Median time to symptom control between SBRT and CF-EBRT were 2 (range, 0-6 weeks) and 4 weeks (range, 0-7 weeks), respectively. Symptom control rates with SBRT and CF-EBRT were significantly different (P=.020) with control rates at 10, 12, and 24 months of 74.9% versus 44.1%, 74.9% versus 39.9%, and 74.9% versus 35.7%, respectively. The median time to radiographic failure and unadjusted pain progression was 7 months in both groups. When controlling for gross tumor volume, dose per fraction, smoking, and the use of systemic therapy, biologically effective dose=80 Gy was significant for clinical response (hazard ratio [HR], 0.204; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.043-0.963; P=.046) and radiographic (HR, 0.075; 95% CI, 0.013-0.430; P=.004). When controlling for gross tumor volume and total dose, biologically effective dose >= 80 Gy was again predictive of clinical local control (HR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.025-0.787; P=.026). Toxicity rates were low and equivalent in both groups, with no grade 4 or 5 toxicity reported.Conclusions: SBRT is both safe and effective for treating RCC bone metastases, with rapid improvement in symptoms after treatment and more durable clinical and radiographic response rate. Future prospective trials are needed to further define efficacy and toxicity of treatment, especially in the setting of targeted agents. (C) 2015 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要