Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6mm) versus longer dental implants (11‐15mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY(2015)

引用 51|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Aim: To compare, clinically and radiographically, short dental implants (6 mm) to long implants (11-15 mm) placed with sinus grafting. Methods: Participants with 5-7 mm of bone height in the posterior maxilla were randomly allocated to receive short implants (GS) or long implants with sinus grafting (GG). Implants were loaded with single crowns 6 months after placement (PR). Patients were re-evaluated 12 months after loading (FU-1). Outcome variables included: Implant survival rate (CSR), marginal bone level alteration (MBL), periodontal probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque control record (PCR) and crown-to-implant ratios (C/I). Statistical analysis was performed using parametric tests. Results: In 97 subjects, 132 implants were re-evaluated at FU-1. The CSR was 100%. The MBL from implant placement (IP) to (PR) was -0.22 +/- 0.4 mm for GG and -0.3 +/- 0.45 mm for GS (p < 0.001). MBL from IP to FU-1 was -0.37 +/- 0.59 mm for GG and -0.22 +/- 0.3 mm for GS (p < 0.001). Intergroup comparisons showed non-significant differences for MBL (p > 0.05), PPD (p = 1) and PCR (p = 0.09). BoP was higher in the GS (p = 0.04). The C/I was 0.99 +/- 0.17 for GG and 1.86 +/- 0.23 for GS (p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between C/I and MBL, (GG: p = 0.13; GS: p = 0.38). Conclusions: Both treatment modalities provided similar outcomes.
更多
查看译文
关键词
bone augmentation,dental implant,multicentre,randomized controlled clinical trial,short dental implant,sinus floor elevation,sinus grafting
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要