Point-of-care measurement of fetal blood lactate - Time to trust a new device.

Mandy Wang,Seng C Chua, Lilain Bouhadir, Erin L Treadwell,Emma Gibbs,Therese M McGee

AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY(2018)

引用 12|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
BackgroundPoint-of-care lactate devices are used worldwide for intrapartum decision making. Current practice is often based on Lactate Pro (Arkray) but its imminent product discontinuation necessitates determination of an optimal replacement device. AimsTo evaluate the performance of Lactate Pro and two other point-of-care devices, Lactate Pro 2 (Arkray) and StatStrip (Nova Biomedical), and to derive scalp lactate cut-offs equivalent to the current intervention trigger of >4.8mmol/L. Materials and methodsPaired umbilical cord arterial and venous blood samples from 109 births were tested on the three point-of-care products (two devices each), cross-compared with the reference method blood gas analyser. ResultsAll brands deviate from the blood gas analyser, with Lactate Pro and StatStrip results consistently lower and Lactate Pro 2 consistently higher. Standard deviation from the blood gas analyser was smallest for StatStrip (0.78mmol/L, cord artery), and largest for Lactate Pro 2 (1.03mmol/L, cord artery). Within-brand variation exists and is similar for all brands (mean absolute difference on cord artery 0.23-0.30mmol/L). Equivalent values to the 4.8mmol/L intervention threshold based on Lactate Pro are 4.9-5.0mmol/L for StatStrip and 5.3-5.9mmol/L for Lactate Pro 2, calculated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. ConclusionsStatStrip appears superior to Lactate Pro 2 to replace the original Lactate Pro. Using StatStrip, the 4.8mmol/L intervention threshold equivalent was 4.9-5.0mmol/L. The variation in accuracy of point-of-care lactate devices may exceed the small increments (eg <4.2mmol/L vs >4.8mmol/L) that guide obstetric decisions.
更多
查看译文
关键词
fetal blood,fetal monitoring,lactate,point-of-care testing
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要