Meta-analysis of Mechanical versus Biological Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 40 to 70 Years

James Wu,Michael Seco,James Edelman, Guy Eslick,Michael Wilson,Michael Vallely,Michael Byrom,Paul Bannon

Heart Lung and Circulation（2016）

引用 3|浏览9

暂无评分

摘要

Purpose: Selection of a mechanical valve (MV) or a biological valve (BV) in aortic valve replacement (AVR) for middle-aged adults remains controversial, and rotates around different complications with different time-related rates. In light of this evolving issue, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of studies comparing long-term clinical outcomes between MVs and BVs in patients aged 40 to 70 years.

查看译文

关键词

Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement,Prosthetic Valves Evaluation,Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement,Aortic Root Replacement

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要