谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Liver Transplantation from Donor after Cardiac Death (DCD) Maastricht Type IIA, Our Experience after 10 Years

Transplantation(2018)

引用 1|浏览18
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction Ten years after the beginning of the donation after cardic death (DCD) programme in the University Hospital 12 de Octubre, we study the evolution of the results of said programme over time. Objectives To compare the results of liver transplantation (LT) using grafts obtained from donors after cardiac death (DCD type Maastricht IIA) performed during the first period (A) of the programme (January 2006 to December 2010) versus those performed during a later period defined from January 2011 to December 2016 (B). Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of the DCD liver transplantation series in the University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Results 75 LT from DCD type IIA have been reviewed, 44 performed during period A and 31 during period B. Mean recipient ages were 59+8 y 58+6 (NS) respectively, with a similar number of male patients (79,5% vs. 71% NS). There were no statistically significant differences found regarding other recipient characteristics such as MELD score, hepatocellular carcinoma or HCV infection. Mean donor age was 38+9 years in group A and 46+7 in group B (p 0.000). When reviewing ischemia times (IT), cold IT was shorter in group B (A 7:00 vs. B 6:05; p 0.046) as was warm IT (A 1:08 vs. B 0:58, p 0.025). However NECMO time was significantly shorter during the first period (3:16 vs. 3:37 min, p 0.027). Recipient survival during period A at 1, 3 and 5 years was 77.3%, 61.4% and 59.1% while during period B it was 87.1%, 83.7% and 83.7% (p 0.039). Graft survival after period A was significantly lower as well (63.6%, 50% and 47.7% vs. 83.9%, 80.5% and 80.5% in group B; p 0.008). The incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy was higher in group A (43.2% vs. 13.3%; p 0.006), as well as the retransplantation rate (A 18.2% vs. B 3.2%; p 0.05). There were non-statistically significant differences found regarding the incidence of primary graft non-function (A 11.4% vs. 3.3% in group B; p 0.214). Conclusions The study shows a significant improvement in the results of DCD liver transplantation through time, possibly related to graft ischemia time optimization.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要