Comparison of two "a priori" risk assessment algorithms for preeclampsia in Italy: a prospective multicenter study.

Daniela Di Martino,Bianca Masturzo,Sara Paracchini,Benedetta Bracco,Paolo Cavoretto,Federico Prefumo,Chiara Germano,Danila Morano,Flavia Girlando,Veronica Giorgione,Giulia Parpinel,Luisa Cariello,Federica Fusè,Massimo Candiani,Tullia Todros,Nicola Rizzo,Antonio Farina

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics（2019）

引用 8|浏览63

暂无评分

摘要

The Fetal Medicine Foundation screening for preeclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation scored the highest detection rate for both early and late PE. At a fixed 10% false positive rate, the estimated "a priori" risks of both the Fetal Medicine Foundation and the BCNatal algorithms in an Italian population were quite similar, and both were reliable and consistent.

查看译文

关键词

A priori risk,Detection rate,ROC curves,Screening for preeclampsia

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要