The del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in aortic valve replacement: A randomized trial.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery(2019)

引用 56|浏览8
暂无评分
摘要
OBJECTIVES:To compare the cardioprotective efficacy of a solution that requires only a single infusion at the start of the ischemic duration versus a solution that requires multiple infusions. METHODS:Aortic valve replacement was performed for 150 patients, who were randomized into the del Nido (DN) cardioplegia group or the cold blood (CB) cardioplegia group. The DN cardioplegia was delivered every 90 minutes and the CB cardioplegia was delivered every 20 to 30 minutes, or whenever cardiac activity was observed. The primary endpoints were electrical cardiac activity during crossclamp, ventricular fibrillation during reperfusion, and postoperative troponin and creatine kinase (CK-MB isoenzyme) at 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS:Electrical activity during crossclamp occurred in 29 (39.7%) patients in the DN group versus 34 (45.3%) patients in the CB group (adjusted P = 1.0). The number of procedures with ventricular fibrillation after removing the crossclamp was 41 (54.7%) in the CB group versus 17 (22.7%) in the DN group (adjusted P = .001; relative risk, 2.41). Troponin values appeared to be lower in the DN group (median, 223.10; interquartile range, 168.35-364.77 pg/mL vs 285.5; 196.20-419.45 pg/mL at 24 hours and 159.60; 125.42-217.20 pg/mL vs 201.60; 160.62-268.45 pg/mL at 48 hours) and CK-MB (median, 14.94; interquartile range, 12.16-20.39 ng/mL vs 17.43; 13.66-22.43 ng/mL at 24 hours and 6.19; 4.41-7.63 ng/mL vs 7.38; 4.74-10.20 ng/mL at 48 hours), but no significance was found. CONCLUSIONS:The del Nido cardioplegia protocol is an acceptable alternative for cold blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要