Clinical Scoring Versus Chlamydia Antibody Titre as a Tool in Predicting Tubal Patency in Subfertile Women.

This study was done to compare the predictive capacity of Clinical scoring and Chlamydia antibody titre in predicting tubal patency. This cross sectional comparative study was done in Institute of Child and Mother Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2018 to December 2018. Eighty eight infertile women with normal ovarian reserve and their husbands with normal semen parameters were purposively included. After taking written informed consent, Clinical scoring, Chlamydia antibody titre and Hysterosalpingography of the study population were done. Data expressed as mean and standard deviation. Logistic regression analysis was done. The predictive capacity was analyzed by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and relative risk. Area under the Curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic was done. A p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Fifty three and half percent had bilateral and 8% had unilateral tubal block and 38.5% had bilateral patent tubes. Clinical scoring versus Hysterosalphingography and Chlamydia antibody titre versus Hysterosalphingography of the study population had sensitivity 87.04% and 48.15%, specificity 76.47% and 58.82%, positive predictive value 82.95% and 52.27%, negative predictive value78.79% and 41.67% and relative risk 5.42 and 0.84 respectively. The Clinical Scoring is better than Chlamydia Antibody Titre as a tool in predicting tubal patency.