Second-line rituximab-bendamustine versus rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the real world.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH(2019)

引用 12|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Aim: Despite long-term responses to first-line immunochemotherapy, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have relapsed/refractory disease. Second-line treatment options are available. However, a large proportion of patients are ineligible for transplantation/intensive therapy. Patients & methods: This observational study of 702 patients in the USA, who used second-line therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, evaluated treatment patterns and overall survival (OS). The study focused on the OS outcome of patients receiving second-line rituximab-bendamustine or rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. Results & conclusion: Rituximab-bendamustine and rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin were received by 4.6 and 1.4% of patients, respectively (N = 42/702). Median and 1-year OS rates were similar between regimens. Many of the 200 different treatment regimens observed in second line were modified versions of National Comprehensive Cancer Network regimens.
更多
查看译文
关键词
bendamustine,diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,gemcitabine,oxaliplatin,real-world study,rituximab
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要