A Comparative Study Between the Stryker EZout Powered Acetabular Revision System and the Zimmer Explant Acetabular Cup Removal Systems
Techniques in Orthopaedics(2019)
摘要
The conservation of bone stock and the decrease of intraoperative acetabular fracture risk associated with revision surgery is a primary goal to improve the outcome of the procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of the Explant Acetabular Cup Removal System and the EZout Powered Acetabular Revision System in an in vitro model. Acetabular components were implanted into instrumented composite hemipelvises and divided into 2 groups, EZout System and Explant System. One experienced orthopedic surgeon and 1 orthopedic resident physician performed the removal procedures. The strains at various points in the periacetabular bone, the temperature at the implant-bone interface, the total time to removal, the torque applied to the implant and the amount of acetabular foam on each cup after extraction, as a surrogate for cavitary acetabular bone stock loss, were calculated for each test. Statistical analysis was conducted using 2-way multivariate analysis of variance followed by Tukey honestly significant difference multiple comparisons. The EZout System required an overall lower force and torque (P<0.0001, both) during removal, producing lower strains in the surrounding composite bone. The procedure was faster (P<0.0001) and less energy demanding with the EZout compared with the Explant. The amount of foam on the cup was on average less for the EZout than for the Explant (P<0.05). We found that the EZout System is effective in achieving safe removal of a well-fixed acetabular component in an in vitro model of cementless fixation. This system should be considered as a reasonable alternative to manual removal techniques.
更多查看译文
关键词
hip, revision, revision arthroplasty, arthroplasty, EZout, Explant, acetabular cup, bone conservation, osteotome
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络