Clinical Precision, Accuracy, Number And Durations Of Exhalations For F Novel Electrochemical Monitor For Exhaled Nitric Oxide

P. E. Silkoff,B. Awabdy,M. Sarno, S. Ssenyange, V. Balasubramanyam, R. Leard

JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH(2020)

引用 5|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a validated marker of eosinophilic inflammation. Fenom Pro(TM) is a novel FDA-cleared monitor for FeNO. The American Thoracic Guidelines from 2005 recommend at least 6 s exhalation for adults and in some cases up to 10 s, and 4 s for children, and that the average of the first two valid exhalations is taken as the FeNO value. Methods: Clinical precision, 6 versus 10 s exhalations, the first versus the average of the first two valid exhalation methods comparison were evaluated for Fenom Pro(TM), as well as a methods comparison to the NIOX VERO monitor. Results: The intent-to-treat population (n = 126) consisted of 83 adults, and 43 pediatric subjects with 16 subjects under 12 years of age. Clinical precision for 10 s exhalations on Fenom Pro(TM) was excellent with a within-subject standard deviation (SD) range of 0.57-3.73 ppb and mean coefficient of variation (CV) range of 4.21% to 9.65%. The clinical precision for the separate adult and pediatric groups as well as for the 6 s exhalations were similar. The 10 and 6 s exhalation comparisons and one versus the average of two valid exhalations showed a high level of agreement. The Fenom Pro(TM) and the NIOX VERO monitors also demonstrated a high level of agreement with the values from the latter slightly lower (mean bias of -3.2 ppb). Conclusion: Fenom Pro(TM) demonstrated eminently acceptable performance supporting its clinical utility. The data suggests that 6 s exhalations can be used in adults and children, and that one exhalation is adequate rather than obtaining the average of two exhalations on Fenom Pro(TM).
更多
查看译文
关键词
exhaled,nitric,oxide,precision,methods,comparison
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要