谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

False positives in the ultrasound diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: some diseases can also show the halo sign.

RHEUMATOLOGY(2020)

引用 40|浏览25
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives. To describe the frequency and causes for the presence of a halo sign on the ultrasound of patients without a diagnosis of GCA. Methods. In total, 305 patients with temporal artery colour Doppler ultrasound showing the presence of halo sign (intima-media thickness >= 0.34 mm for temporal arteries [TAs] and >= 1 mm for axillary arteries) were included, and their medical records were reviewed. The clinical diagnosis based on the evolution of the patient over at least one year was established as the definitive diagnosis. Results. Fourteen of the 305 (4.6%) patients included showed presence of the halo sign without final diagnosis of GCA: 12 patients in the TAs (86%), and two patients with isolated AAs involvement (14%). Their diagnoses were PMR (n = 4, 29%); atherosclerosis (n = 3, 21%); and non-Hodgkin lymphoma type T, osteomyelitis of the skull base, primary amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, neurosyphilis, urinary sepsis and narrow-angle glaucoma (n = 1 each, 7%). Conclusion. The percentage of halo signs on the ultrasound of patients without GCA is low, but it does exist. There are conditions that may also show the halo sign (true positive halo sign), and we must know these and always correlate the ultrasound findings with the patient's clinic records.
更多
查看译文
关键词
giant cell arteritis,ultrasound,temporal arteritis,false positives,vasculitis,ultrasonography,specificity,halo sign
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要