Duration of active psychosis during early phases of the illness and functional outcome: The PAFIP 10-year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION:Longer duration of active psychosis (presence of positive psychotic symptoms) has been associated to worsening of functional and symptomatic outcome in patients with a first-episode of psychosis. There could be a "critical period" of increased brain vulnerability in the early phases of the illness when the effect of active psychosis would be exceptionally pernicious. OBJECTIVES:We aim to explore the impact of lengthy periods of active psychosis during early phases of illness on long-term functional outcome. METHODS:This is a prospective clinical study. We assessed the effect of the duration active psychosis in patients with a first-episode of nonaffective psychosis on long-term social functioning and functional recovery. The study consisted of a 3-year clinical follow-up and a functional evaluation performed after a 10-year period. RESULTS:The sample consisted of 169 patients with a first-episode of non-affective psychosis. The duration of active psychosis after treatment (DAT) during the 3-year clinical follow-up acted as predictor of social functioning at the 10-year functional evaluation (Wald: 10.705; p = .001), but not of functional recovery. The duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) did not act as a predictor of any of the two long-term measures of functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS:Active psychosis in early phases of the illness seems to be correlated to worst long-term functionality. In this study the duration of active psychosis after treatment (DAT) was a better predictor of long-term outcome than the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). Reducing DAT should be considered an important objective for early intervention programs.