Dose-Effect Relationships Of Ho-166 Radioembolization In Colorectal Cancer

Radioembolization is a treatment option for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with inoperable, chemorefractory hepatic metastases. Personalized treatment requires established dose thresholds. Hence, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between dose and effect (i.e., response and toxicity) in CRC patients treated with Ho-166 radioembolization. Methods: CRC patients treated in the HEPAR II and SIM studies were analyzed. Absorbed doses were estimated using the activity distribution on posttreatment Ho-166 SPECT/CT. Metabolic response was assessed using the change in total-lesion glycolysis on F-18-FDG PET/CT between baseline and 3-mo follow-up. Toxicity between treatment and 3 mo was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5, and its relationship with parenchyma-absorbed dose was assessed using linear models. The relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and patientand tumor-level response was analyzed using linear mixed models. Using a threshold of 100% sensitivity for response, the threshold for a minimal mean tumor-absorbed dose was determined and its impact on survival was assessed. Results: Forty patients were included. The median parenchyma-absorbed dose was 37 Gy (range, 12-55 Gy). New CTCAE grade 3 or higher clinical and laboratory toxicity was present in 8 and 7 patients, respectively. For any clinical toxicity (highest grade per patient), the mean difference in parenchymal dose (Gy) per step increase in CTCAE grade category was 5.75 (95% CI, 1.18-10.32). On a patient level, metabolic response was as follows: complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 11; stable disease, n = 17; and progressive disease, n = 8. The mean tumor-absorbed dose was 84% higher in patients with complete or partial response than in patients with progressive disease (95% CI, 20%-180%). Survival for patients with a mean tumor-absorbed dose of more than 90 Gy was significantly better than for patients with a mean tumor-absorbed dose of less than 90 Gy (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.511). Conclusion: A significant dose-response relationship in CRC patients treated with Ho-166 radioembolization was established, and a positive association between toxicity and parenchymal dose was found. For future patients, it is advocated to use a Ho-166 scout dose to select patients and yo personalize the administered activity, targeting a mean tumor-absorbed dose of more than 90 Gy and a parenchymal dose of less than 55 Gy.