Conservative Two-Stage Revision With Primary Components Of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis Of Survival, Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes

Few studies provide an analysis of conservative two-stage revision of hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and its impact on final outcome. A conservative revision is defined when soft tissues and bone quality enable the use of primary prosthetic components. Data of patients treated for chronic hip PJI who underwent two-stage revision between 2009 and 2016 and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were collected. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiological and microbiological data were retrieved and analysed. Clinical and functional outcome, survival, mortality, eradication, reinfection and re-revision rates within subgroups of patients with primary components and revision components are reported herein. A total of 148 patients underwent two-stage hip exchange with a mean follow-up of 55.6 +/- 23.1 months and a mean age at surgery of 64.3 +/- 12.7 years. Forty-four percent of patients underwent conservative revision. The mean HHS significantly improved from 40.6 +/- 9.4 points to the final value of 87.8 +/- 10.5 points (p = .002), and the mean OHS went from 20.3 +/- 3.8 points to 40.3 +/- 5. points (p<.001). Patients who were treated with primary components or isolated revision stems in the second stage had a significant reduction in surgical times (p<.001). The mortality rate for all causes of death was 6.8%, the eradication rate was 89.9%, the reinfection rate was 4.7% and the reoperation rate was 7.4% without differences between conservative and non-conservative revisions. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for total hip arthroplasty (THA) PJI is a good strategy that provides satisfactory results, high eradication rates and no further need for revision. The conservative two-stage revision in patients with adequate bone stock represents a feasible option with good results and survival rates.