Outcomes Of Two-Stage Interpolated Flaps Versus Single-Stage Techniques For Reconstruction Of Intermediate Nasal Defects

Objective: This study compares the results of patients undergoing reconstruction of intermediate nasal defects, measuring 1.5-2.5 cm, with single-staged techniques as opposed to the traditionally recommended staged interpolated flap reconstruction.Design: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction of a nasal defect by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2016.Methods: Postoperative results including revision surgery, treating persistent edema with Kenalog (triamcinolone acetonide), and perioperative complications were analyzed. Aesthetic outcomes were analyzed by a panel of experts and nonexperts, and compared using a 5-point Likert scale.Results: In total, 51 single-stage and 26 two-stage patients underwent evaluation, and of these, 40 single-stage and 15 two-stage patients underwent panel analysis of aesthetic outcomes. The odds of requiring a revision procedure were 6.69 times higher and odds of using Kenalog postoperatively were 29.67 times higher in the two-stage group than in the single-stage group. Aesthetic scores were consistently better for the single-stage group for both panels.Conclusion: Patients undergoing single-stage techniques for reconstruction of intermediate nasal defects showed improved appearance and reduced number of additional procedures relative to patients undergoing two-stage techniques with short-term follow-up.