Cost-effectiveness analysis of vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of reflux esophagitis in China

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been recommended as standard of care for reflux esophagitis ( RE). Vonoprazan (VPZ), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker ( P-CAB), has been approved in China after demonstrating clinical benefit in RE. However, there are not any published literature reported the cost-effectiveness of VPZ compared with PPI in Chinese healthcare setting. Thus, this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of VPZ compared with PPIs for the treatment of RE patients in China and take advantage of this result to inform healthcare decision-making. Methods: A Markov model was developed to predict the effectiveness and costs of VPZ for 4 weeks and PPI group for 8 weeks in RE treatment over a 5-year time horizon from a healthcare system perspective. Four health states within healing and maintenance phases were defined in the model: mucosa healed, mucosa unhealed, relapse, and death. Transition probabilities including healing rate and relapse rate were derived from a single-arm meta-analysis and mortality were obtained from Chinese life table. Drug costs and other medical expenses were retrieved from China tendering prices and local clinical expert estimation. Utility parameters were derived from published literature. Both health outcomes and costs were discounted at a rate of 5% annually. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), direct medical costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were evaluated. Uncertainty was assessed by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Results: The healing rate for VPZ and PPI were 90% (95% CI: 82-97%) and 74% (95% CI: 71-76%) at week 4 respectively and were 94% (95% CI: 88-99%) and 87% (95% CI: 85-88%) at week 8 respectively. Treatment with VPZ resulted in 4.35 QALYs at a total cost of USD 1,354 over 5 years. Compared with the PPI group, treating RE with VPZ was associated with 0.02 QALYs gained and a cost saving of USD 943. Thus, VPZ should be considered as the dominant treatment option. The model results were deemed robust in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: VPZ generates incremental QALYs at a lower cost compared with PPI, thus could be considered as an optional choice in the treatment of patients with RE.