Clinical and Cost Profile of Controlled Grade B Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Rationale for Their Consideration as Low Risk

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY(2021)

引用 3|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Background Despite standardization, the 2016 ISGPF criteria are limited by their wider applicability and oversimplification of grade B POPF. This work applied the 2016 ISGPF grading criteria within a US academic cancer center to verify clinical and fiscal distinctions and sought to improve grading criteria for grade B POPF. Methods The 2008–2018 cost and NSQIP data from pancreaticoduodenectomy to postoperative day 90 were merged. All POPFs were coded by 2016 ISGPF criteria. The Clavien-Dindo Classification (CD) defined complication severity. On sub-analyses, grade B POPFs were divided into those with adequate drainage and those requiring additional drainage. Chi-square, ANOVA, and Fisher’s least significant difference test were employed. Results Two hundred thirty-two patients were in the final analyses, 72 (31%) of whom had POPFs: 16 (7%) biochemical leaks, 54 (23%) grade B (28% required additional drainage), and 2 (1%) grade C. There was no significant difference in length of stay, CD, readmission, or cost in patients without a POPF, with biochemical leak or grade B POPF. On sub-analyses, 92% of adequately drained grade B POPFs had CD 1–2 and readmission equivalent to patients without POPF ( p > 0.05). One hundred percent of grade B POPF requiring drainage had CD 3–4a, and 67% were readmitted. Cost was significantly increased in grade B POPF requiring additional drainage ( p = 0.02) and grade C POPF ( p < 0.01). Conclusions This analysis did not confirm an incremental increase in morbidity and cost with POPF grade. Sub-analyses enabled accurate clinical and cost distinctions in grade B POPF; adequately drained grade B POPF are low risk and clinically insignificant.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Whipple,Pancreaticoduodenectomy,Pancreatic fistula,Cost,POPF
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要