Efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES(2022)

引用 9|浏览15
暂无评分
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to recalculate the efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains and discuss the main variables associated with controlled trials to evaluate bovine brucellosis vaccine efficacy (VE). The most commonly used vaccine strain was S19, at a dose of 10(10) colony forming units (CFU), followed by RB51 at 10(10) CFU. The most commonly used challenge strain was B. abortus 2308, at a dose of 10(7) CFU, by the intraconjunctival route. Regarding the meta-analysis, trials were grouped according to the vaccine strain and dose to recalculate protection against abortion (four groups) or infection (five groups) using pooled risk ratio (RR) and VE. Regarding protection against abortion (n = 15 trials), the S19 vaccine at 10(9) CFU exhibited the highest protection rate (RR = 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.12-0.52; VE = 75.09%, 95% CI: 48.08-88.05), followed by RB51 at 10(10) CFU (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.61; VE = 69.25%, 95% CI: 39.48-84.38). Regarding protection against infection (n = 23 trials), only two subgroups exhibited significant protection: S19 at 10(9) CFU (RR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.55; VE = 72.03%, 95% CI: 57.70- 81.50) and RB51 at 10(10) CFU (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.84; VE = 57.05%, 95% CI: 30.90-73.30). In conclusion, our results suggest that a dose of 10(9) CFU for S19 and 10(10) CFU for RB51 are the most suitable for the prevention of abortion and infection caused by B. abortus.
更多
查看译文
关键词
abortion, bovine brucellosis, infection, protection, vaccination
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要