谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support in Mechanically Ventilated Stroke Patients

Research Square (Research Square)(2020)

引用 0|浏览22
暂无评分
摘要
Background. The determinants of decisions to limit life support (withholding or withdrawal) in ventilated stroke patients have been poorly investigated.Methods. In a prospective multicenter observational cohort (2005-2016), we evaluated limitation of life support in ventilated stroke patients compared to a non-brain-injured population and identified factors associated with such decisions in stroke patients using Fine and Gray competing risk models.Results. We identified 373 stroke patients (ischemic, n=167 (45%); hemorrhagic, n=206 (55%)), and 5683 non-brain-injured patients. Decisions to limit life support were taken in 41% of ischemic stroke cases (vs. non-brain-injured patients, sHR 3.59 [95% CI 2.78-4.65]) and in 33% of hemorrhagic stroke cases (vs. non-brain-injured patients, sHR 3.9 [95% CI 2.97-5.11]). Time from ICU admission to the first limitation was longer in ischemic than in hemorrhagic stroke (5 [3 - 9] vs 2 [1 - 6] days, p<0.01). Limitation of life support preceded ICU death in 70% of ischemic strokes and 45% of hemorrhagic strokes (p<0.01). Life support limitation in ischemic stroke was associated with a vertebrobasilar location (vs. anterior circulation, sHR, 1.61 [95% CI 1.01 - 2.59]) and in hemorrhagic stroke, it was associated with an age>70 years (2.29 [1.43 - 3.69]), a Glasgow score<8 (2.15 [1.08 - 4.3]) and a lower non-neurologic admission SOFA score (per point, 0.89 [0.82 - 0.97]).Conclusions. In ventilated stroke patients, decisions to limit life support are more than 3 times more frequent than in non-brain injured patients, with different timing and associated risk factors between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Advanced Life Support,Constraint-Induced Therapy
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要