Real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis using standardized, quantitative outcome metrics

Background Prior studies suggest comparable effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using relapse, Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion metrics. Objective Compare the real-world effectiveness of DMF versus FTY using quantitative, validated neuroperformance tests, MRI, and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) outcomes while controlling for between-group differences. Methods Patients were eligible if on DMF or FTY when first enrolled in the MS Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network and had >= 1-year follow-up in MS PATHS. Sensitivity analysis included a subgroup who started DMF/FTY <= 2 years from enrolment. After propensity score weighting, differences in means and in mean 1-year change of neuroperformance and MRI outcomes were compared. sNfL levels were assessed. This was a non-randomized comparison. Results In the overall cohort, no significant differences were observed between DMF (n = 702) and FTY (n = 600) in neuroperformance or MRI outcomes including brain volume loss; mean time (SD) since treatment initiation was 1.98 (0.68) years for DMF and 2.02 (0.75) years for FTY. A sensitivity analysis controlling for DMF and FTY treatment duration yielded similar results. Conclusion In this study, DMF and FTY demonstrated similar effects on physical and cognitive neuroperformance and MRI outcomes. Direct comparisons to other fumarates and S1P receptor modulators were not conducted.