Implementation of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in pediatric acute respiratory failure: a controlled before-after quality improvement study

Backgrounds Pediatric noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) has been shown to improve patient-ventilator interaction but no data on clinical outcomes are available. Aim of this study was to compare NIV-NAVA with noninvasive pressure support (NIV-PS) in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), in a single-center before-after study. A cohort of thirty-four NIV-PS patients (before group) admitted to our PICU within the 2 years prior NAVA introduction was compared with a cohort of thirty children treated with NIV-NAVA during implementation phase (after group). The primary end-point was intubation rate between groups. Days on mechanical ventilation, number of invasive devices, nosocomial infections, PICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), and physiological parameters at 2 and 24 h after admission were considered. Results Intubation rate was lower in the NIV-NAVA group as compared to the NIV-PS group ( p = 0.006). Patients treated with NIV-NAVA required fewer invasive devices ( p = 0.032) and had lower incidence of ventilator-acquired pneumonia ( p = 0.004) and shorter PICU ( p = 0.032) and hospital LOS ( p = 0.013). At 2 h, NIV-NAVA compared with NIV-PS resulted in higher paO 2 :FIO 2 ( p = 0.017), lower paCO 2 ( p = 0.002), RR ( p = 0.026), and HR ( p = 0.009). Conclusions Early NIV-NAVA vs NIV-PS was associated to lower intubation rate and shorter PICU and hospital LOS. Further studies are needed in order to confirm these preliminary data.