VALIDATION OF MOBILE APPLICATION MEASURING VOIDED VOLUME: A PILOT PROSPECTIVE STUDY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP30-12 VALIDATION OF MOBILE APPLICATION MEASURING VOIDED VOLUME: A PILOT PROSPECTIVE STUDY Hwanik Kim, Jin Hyuck Kim, Changhee Ye, Gyoohwan Jung, Jung Kwon Kim, Hakmin Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, and Sangchul Lee Hwanik KimHwanik Kim More articles by this author , Jin Hyuck KimJin Hyuck Kim More articles by this author , Changhee YeChanghee Ye More articles by this author , Gyoohwan JungGyoohwan Jung More articles by this author , Jung Kwon KimJung Kwon Kim More articles by this author , Hakmin LeeHakmin Lee More articles by this author , Seong Jin JeongSeong Jin Jeong More articles by this author , and Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002573.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Comparing urine flow tests performed at the clinic with the actual urination at home, there can be a mental burden and straining of urine that can affect the test results. The need for a comfortable, convenient, and even portable, home-based device has led to the development of novel uroflowmetry technology. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a new smartphone-based acoustic voiding volume measurement application compared to conventional ultrasound bladder volume scanner. METHODS: A total of 12 subjects from September 2020 to March 2021 were prospectively enrolled with informed consent to compare novel acoustic voiding volume measurement to conventional ultrasound bladder volume scanner. 2 subjects were excluded their measurement do not meet our standard of sound quality (i.e. voiding in environment with very loud fan noise, voiding to the wall, door slams). Finally, 10 patients with 50 voiding measurements were included for analysis. The value measured before urination by bladder scanner (A), the value measured after urination by bladder scanner (B), and the value of voided volume measured by smartphone-based acoustic voiding volume measurement mobile application (C) were compared between the 2 techniques. Reliability and accuracy of the voided volume results were compared using Pearson correlation coefficient, and student t-test, respectively. RESULTS: 10 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Median age was 53.5. Median values of uroflowmetry proflile are as follows: Qmax: 16.3mL/s, Voided volume: 256.8mL, and postvoid residual urine: 7.5mL. Voided volume between the 2 techniques revealed strong visual correlation (r=0.71, p=0.02). When compared to conventional uroflowmetry. When analyzed separately for each individual, each participant showed stronger correlation (range: 0 59-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The acoustic voiding volume measurement application can take over the role of traditional bladder scan resulted from our validation. Through comparison of bladder scan measurements before and after urination, it was confirmed that the urine volume measurement using the smartphone PRIVY application was accurate. PRIVY application can be a breakthrough that can lower the barriers to entry to health management of patients' urination. Further large-scale studies will further increase the credibility of our results. Source of Funding: N/A © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e482 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hwanik Kim More articles by this author Jin Hyuck Kim More articles by this author Changhee Ye More articles by this author Gyoohwan Jung More articles by this author Jung Kwon Kim More articles by this author Hakmin Lee More articles by this author Seong Jin Jeong More articles by this author Sangchul Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...