Publics' Views of Corporate Social Advocacy Initiatives: Exploring Prior Issue Stance, Attitude Toward a Company, and News Credibility

Corporate social advocacy (CSA) has emerged to promote change on social issues in response to publics' expectations and demands, but how different publics might respond to CSA differently is little understood. Grounded in Du et al.'s (2010) corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication framework, social judgment theory (SJT), and the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), we conducted an online survey (N = 505) to examine whether publics perceived CSA differently depending on their existing stance on an issue and whether the existing stance interacted with their attitude toward the company and news credibility. The results showed that individuals' reaction to the CSA differed in light of their existing stance on an issue. Furthermore, when an individual's stance was undecided, attitude toward the company and news credibility were significantly related to change in issue stance, attitude toward the CSA campaign, and skepticism toward the company's motives. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications.