Patterns-of-care disparities among uninsured versus insured patients with anorectal carcinoma referred for radiotherapy at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital

Background: To compare patterns-of-care and clinical outcomes among uninsured versus insured patients (IPs) with anorectal malignancies referred for radiotherapy at an urban safety-net hospital. This topic is important because uninsured patients (UPs) in the US often have limited access to health care, which can result in worse health outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 59 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic anal and rectal cancers who received curative-intent primary or neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiotherapy between May 2002 and August 2012. Data regarding patient and disease characteristics, weight loss, insurance status at symptom onset, date of first therapeutic intervention, and survival status at last follow-up, were collected and analyzed. Results: The percentage of IPs presenting with T4 tumors was 7% versus 40% among the uninsured (P=0.005). The median interval between first symptom onset and diagnosis date was 89 (range, 0-1,428) days for IPs and 221 (range, 0-1,576) days for UPs (P=0.01). The median interval between first symptom onset and treatment initiation was 172 (range, 9-1,498) days for IPs and 302 (range, 35-1,624 days) days for UPs (P=0.01). The 5-year overall survival rate was 59% for the entire cohort, 62% for the insured patients, and 55% for the uninsured patients (P=0.76) Conclusions: Differences in health insurance status demonstrated various disparities in patterns-of-care, including significant delay in diagnosis, more advanced-stage disease at presentation, and treatment initiation delays among UPs. Nevertheless, overall survival at 5 years was not statistically significant between the insured and the uninsured.