Sagittal Growth Restriction of the Midface Following Isolated Cleft Lip Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL(2022)

引用 3|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: Midface hypoplasia (MFH) is a long-term sequela of cleft lip and palate repair, and is poorly understood. No study has examined the aggregate data on sagittal growth restriction of the midface following repair of the lip, but not palate, in these patients. Methods: A systematic review of 3780 articles was performed. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and II reported cephalometric measurements amenable to meta-analysis. Patients with Veau class I-III palatal clefts were included so long as they had undergone only lip repair. Groups were compared against both noncleft and unrepaired controls. Results: Cephalometrics were reported for 326 patients (31.3% female). Noncleft controls had an average SNA angle of 81.25 degrees +/- 3.12 degrees. The only patients demonstrating hypoplastic SNA angles were those with unilateral CLP with isolated lip repair (77.4 degrees +/- 4.22 degrees). Patients with repaired CL had SNA angles similar to noncleft controls (81.4 degrees +/- 4.02 degrees). Patients with unrepaired CLP and CL tended toward more protruding maxillae, with SNA angles of 83.3 degrees +/- 4.04 degrees and 87.9 degrees +/- 3.11 degrees, respectively. Notably, when comparing SNA angles between groups, patients with CLP with isolated lip repair had significantly more hypoplastic angles compared to those with repaired CL (P < .0001). Patients with CLP with isolated lip repair were also more hypoplastic than noncleft controls (P < .0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference between the SNA of patients with repaired CL and controls (P = .648). Conclusion: We found that cleft lip repair only appeared to contribute to MFH in the setting of concurrent cleft palate pathology, suggesting that scarring from lip repair itself is unlikely to be the predominant driver of MFH development. However, studies generally suffered from inadequate reporting of timing, technique, follow-up time, and cleft severity.
更多
查看译文
关键词
nonsyndromic clefting, midfacial growth, surgical technique, cephalometry, craniofacial growth
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要