Comparison of the usability of an automatic sleep staging program via portable 1-channel electroencephalograph and manual sleep staging with traditional polysomnography

Automatic algorithms are a proposed alternative to manual assessment of polysomnography data for analyzing sleep structure; however, none are acceptably accurate for clinical use. We investigated the feasibility of an automated sleep stage scoring system called Sleep Scope, which is intended for use with portable 1-channel electroencephalograph, and compared it with the traditional polysomnography scoring method. Twenty-six outpatients and fourteen healthy volunteers underwent Sleep Scope and polysomnography assessments simultaneously. Polysomnography records were manually scored by three sleep experts. Sleep Scope records were scored using a dedicated auto-staging algorithm. Sleep parameters, including total sleep time, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency, were calculated. The epoch-by-epoch pairwise concordance based on the classification of sleep into five stages (i.e., wake, rapid eye movement, N1, N2, and N3) was also evaluated after validating homogeneity and bias between Sleep Scope and polysomnography. Compared with polysomnography, Sleep Scope seemed to overestimate sleep latency by approximately 3 min, but there was no consistent tendency in bias in other sleep parameters. The Κ values ranged from 0.66 to 0.75 for experts’ inter-rater polysomnography scores and from 0.62 to 0.67 for Sleep Scope versus polysomnography scores, which indicated sufficient agreement in the determination of sleep stages based on the Landis and Koch criteria. We observed sufficient concordance between Sleep Scope and polysomnography despite lower concordance in sleep disorder patients. Thus, this auto-staging system might serve as a novel clinical tool for reducing the time and expenses required of medical staff and patients.