Effects of different treatments of manure on mitigating methane emissions during storage and preserving the methane potential for anaerobic digestion

Sonja Sif Ólafsdóttir, Claus Dalsgaard Jensen,Anna Lymperatou,Ulrik Birk Henriksen,Hariklia N. Gavala

Journal of Environmental Management(2023)

引用 1|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Current agricultural practices in regards to storage of manure come with a significant GHG contribution, due, to a big extent, to CH4 emissions. For example, in Denmark, the agricultural sector is responsible for about 11.1 metric tons of CO2 equivalents; only about 0.2 metric tons come directly from CO2, while 6.0 tons come from CH4. The present study aims at evaluating and comparing two methods based on their effect on suppressing CH4 emissions during storage as well as on preserving and enhancing CH4 yield in a subsequent anaerobic digestion step: the commonly applied acidification with H2SO4 as acidifying agent and thermal treatment at the mild temperatures of 70 and 90 °C (pasteurization). Although both treatments effectively suppressed CH4 emissions during storage, they exhibited a significant difference in preserving and/or enhancing the CH4 potential of manure. Specifically, thermal treatment resulted in 16–35% enhancement of CH4 potential, while acidification resulted in decreasing the CH4 yield by 6–23% compared to non-treated manure. Further investigation showed that storage itself positively affected the CH4 potential of treated manure in a subsequent anaerobic digestion step; this was attributed to microbial activity other than biomethanation during storage. In overall and based on the results obtained regarding suppression of CH4 emissions during storage as well as CH4 potential enhancement, pasteurization at the temperatures tested is a promising alternative to the broadly applied acidification of manure.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Acidification,Manure management,Manure storage,Methane emissions,Methane potential,Pasteurization
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要