Orbital and periocular complications in patients with sinonasal tumours with orbital invasion

AimsThe purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and associated risk factors of orbital/periocular complications in patients with sinonasal tumour with orbital invasion managed with eye-sparing treatments. MethodsA retrospective case series of patients with primary sinonasal tumour with orbital invasion from January 2008 to December 2018. Patient factors were compared between the following groups: (1)patients with orbital/periocular complications versus those who did not and (2) patients who needed secondary oculoplastic surgical procedures versus those who did not. ResultsOut of 80 patients, 48 had eye-sparing surgery, 8 had orbital exenteration and 24 were managed non-surgically. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (n=28, 35%). Among the eye-sparing treatment group, 51/72 patients experienced one or more orbital/periocular complication(s), with motility deficit (N=26, 36%) being the most frequent. Factors associated with higher risk of complications included tumour involving the orbital floor (p=0.019), clinical disease stage III/IV (p=0.038), maxillectomy (p=0.004), resection of the orbital floor (p=0.027) and cigarette smoking (p=0.041). Tumour involving the orbital floor had an OR of 3.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 11.6, p=0.016) in predicting orbital/periocular complication. In the eye-sparing surgery group, the most frequent secondary oculoplastic procedures was dacryocystorhinostomy (n=6, 13%). The use of a free flap in reconstruction had an OR of 8.2 (95% CI 2.1 to 31.8, p=0.002) in predicting need for secondary oculoplastic surgery. ConclusionMajority of patients with sinonasal tumours and secondary orbital invasion were managed with eye-sparing multidisciplinary treatments. Preservation of the eye can lead to reasonably good functional outcome despite expected orbital and periocular complications.