Future Trends in CT for Coronary Artery Disease: from Diagnosis to Prevention.

HomeRadiologyVol. 307, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorial–Centennial ContentFuture Trends in CT for Coronary Artery Disease: From Diagnosis to PreventionRozemarijn Vliegenthart Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Author AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.Address correspondence to the author (email: [email protected]).Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Published Online:Apr 11 2023https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223285MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70(1):1–25. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 2000;217(2):564–571. Link, Google Scholar3. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246(3):742–753. Link, Google Scholar4. Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Leipsic J, et al. Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J 2018;39(41):3715–3723. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. DISCHARGE Trial Group. Comparative effectiveness of initial computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in women and men with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease: multicentre randomised trial. BMJ 2022;379:e071133. Medline, Google Scholar6. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41(3):407–477. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382(15):1395–1407. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Yun CH, Hung CL, Wen MS, Wan YL, So A. CT assessment of myocardial perfusion and fractional flow reserve in coronary artery disease: a review of current clinical evidence and recent developments. Korean J Radiol 2021;22(11):1749–1763. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Ahmadi A, et al. SCCT 2021 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021;15(3):192–217. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10. Dawson LP, Lum M, Nerleker N, Nicholls SJ, Layland J. Coronary atherosclerotic plaque regression: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79(1):66–82. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11. May LT, Bartolo BA, Harrison DG, et al. Translating atherosclerosis research from bench to bedside: navigating the barriers for effective preclinical drug discovery. Clin Sci (Lond) 2022;136(23):1731–1758. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12. Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M, et al. Sex-specific computed tomography coronary plaque characterization and risk of myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14(9):1804–1814. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13. Deseive S, Kupke M, Straub R, et al. Quantified coronary total plaque volume from computed tomography angiography provides superior 10-year risk stratification. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;22(3):314–321. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14. Si-Mohamed SA, Boccalini S, Lacombe H, et al. Coronary CT angiography with photon-counting CT: first-in-human results. Radiology 2022;303(2):303–313. Link, Google Scholar15. Mergen V, Eberhard M, Manka R, Euler A, Alkadhi H. First in-human quantitative plaque characterization with ultra-high resolution coronary photon-counting CT angiography. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:981012. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16. Goeller M, Achenbach S, Duncker H, Dey D, Marwan M. Imaging of the pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) using cardiac computed tomography: modern clinical implications. J Thorac Imaging 2021;36(3):149–161. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17. Rodriguez Lozano PF, Rrapo Kaso E, Bourque JM, et al. Cardiovascular imaging for ischemic heart disease in women: time for a paradigm shift. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15(8):1488–1501. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18. Truong QA, Rinehart S, Abbara S, et al. Coronary computed tomographic imaging in women: an expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2018;12(6):451–466. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19. Kolossváry M, Karády J, Kikuchi Y, et al. Radiomics versus visual and histogram-based assessment to identify atheromatous lesions at coronary CT angiography: an ex vivo study. Radiology 2019;293(1):89–96. Link, Google Scholar20. Xu P, Xue Y, Schoepf UJ, et al. Radiomics: the next frontier of cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14(3):e011747. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21. Lin A, Kolossváry M, Motwani M, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging for risk stratification in coronary artery disease. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021;3(1):e200512. Link, Google Scholar22. Bray JJH, Hanif MA, Alradhawi M, et al. Machine learning applications in cardiac computed tomography: a composite systematic review. Eur Heart J Open 2022;2(2):oeac018. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23. Mu D, Bai J, Chen W, et al. Calcium scoring at coronary CT angiography using deep learning. Radiology 2022;302(2):309–316. Link, Google Scholar24. Huang Z, Xiao J, Wang X, et al. Clinical evaluation of the automatic Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) in coronary computed tomography angiography using convolutional neural networks. Acad Radiol 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.05.015. Published online June 23, 2022. Google Scholar25. Li M, Ling R, Yu L, et al. Deep learning segmentation and reconstruction for CT of chronic total coronary occlusion. Radiology 2022. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221393. Published online October 25, 2022. Google Scholar26. Carr JJ, Nelson JC, Wong ND, et al. Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Radiology 2005;234(1):35–43. Link, Google Scholar27. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology 2003;228(3):826–833. Link, Google Scholar28. Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Raggi P. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology 1998;208(3):807–814. Link, Google Scholar29. Muhlestein JB, Knowlton KU, Le VT, et al. Coronary artery calcium versus pooled cohort equations score for primary prevention guidance: randomized feasibility trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15(5):843–855. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30. Lindholt JS, Søgaard R, Rasmussen LM, et al. Five-year outcomes of the Danish Cardiovascular Screening (DANCAVAS) Trial. N Engl J Med 2022;387(15):1385–1394. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31. van der Aalst CM, Denissen SJAM, Vonder M, et al. Screening for cardiovascular disease risk using traditional risk factor assessment or coronary artery calcium scoring: the ROBINSCA trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21(11):1216–1224. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32. de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med 2020;382(6):503–513. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33. Behr CM, Koffijberg H, Degeling K, Vliegenthart R, IJzerman MJ. Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation. Eur Radiol 2022;32(5):3067–3075. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34. Nakanishi R, Slomka PJ, Rios R, et al. Machine learning adds to clinical and CAC assessments in predicting 10-year CHD and CVD deaths. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14(3):615–625. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35. Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS, et al. Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J 2017;38(7):500–507. Medline, Google Scholar36. Coorey G, Figtree GA, Fletcher DF, et al. The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field. NPJ Digit Med 2022;5(1):126. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37. Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging—a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology 1988;169(1):59–63. Link, Google Scholar38. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218(1):215–223. Link, Google Scholar39. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography. I. A percutaneous transfemoral technic. Radiology 1967;89(5):815–824. Link, Google Scholar40. Axel L, Dougherty L. Heart wall motion: improved method of spatial modulation of magnetization for MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172(2):349–350. Link, Google Scholar41. Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. “Black blood” T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 1996;199(1):49–57. Link, Google Scholar42. Bluemke DA, Lima JAC. Cardiac imaging 2040. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230160. Published online April 11, 2023 Link, Google Scholar43. Rajiah P, François CJ, Leiner T. Cardiac MRI: state of the art. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223008. Published online April 11, 2023. Link, Google Scholar44. Dodd J, Leipsic J. Evolving developments in cardiac CT. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222827. Published online March 28, 2023. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Dec 20 2022Revision requested: Dec 22 2022Revision received: Dec 24 2022Accepted: Dec 27 2022Published online: Apr 11 2023 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsAccompanying This ArticleCardiac Imaging 2040Jun 6 2023Default Digital Object SeriesRecommended Articles Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging for Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery DiseaseRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging2021Volume: 3Issue: 1Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementRadiology2021Volume: 301Issue: 1pp. 105-112Assessing Cardiovascular Risk by Using the Fat Attenuation Index in Coronary CT AngiographyRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging2021Volume: 3Issue: 1Risk Scores versus Atherosclerosis Imaging: Time to Embrace What Is in Plain Sight!Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging2020Volume: 2Issue: 1Sexual Dimorphism of Coronary Artery Disease in a Low- and Intermediate-Risk Asymptomatic Population: Association with Coronary Vessel Wall Thickness at MRI in WomenRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging2019Volume: 1Issue: 1See More RSNA Education Exhibits Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Current Practice And Future DirectionsDigital Posters2021Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Past, Present and FutureDigital Posters2020Exploring The Role Of Epicardial Fat In Atherosclerotic And Inflammatory StatesDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Takayasu ArteritisRSNA Case Collection2020Subclavian Stenosis with Pre-StealRSNA Case Collection2021Chronic myocardial infarctionRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 307, No. 3 PodcastMetrics Altmetric Score PDF download