The impact of focal therapy tumor boards, including prostate magnetic resonance imaging overreads, in refining the selection candidacy for focal therapy patients: A prospective study.

324 Background: Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer is increasingly recognized as an adequate therapeutic option in well selected men. Nevertheless, in-field and out-of-field recurrences at one year from treatment are notable. A multidisciplinary tumor board geared towards improving focal therapy (FTTB) patient selection is a novel concept which has not been explored. The impact of conducting prostate MRI-overreads during FTTB may also help refine FT candidacy and potentially reduce failure rates. We aimed to explore the value of a dedicated FTTB. Therein, we also evaluated the impact of prostate MRI overreads and its overall influence on FT candidacy. Methods: Single center, prospective study, incorporating a multidisciplinary bi-weekly FTTB (2021-2022) on patients being considered for FT. All prostate MRIs were re-reviewed by a single GU radiologist with >10 years prostate MR imaging experience. Outside pathology, when requested, was also re-reviewed. The impact of such tumor boards, and specifically MRI overreads on patient candidacy are presented. Results: Forty-five patients were presented at our FTTB over the span of one year. Patient demographics are presented. Thirty-nine patients were treatment naïve while six had prior radiation +/- ADT. MRI overread was performed on all treatment naïve patients (39/45, 87%) while pathology overreads on 11/45 (24.4%) Four patients were excluded upfront due to not meeting safety criteria for FT (Urolift device (n=1), J-pouch (n=1), suspicions of metastasis at time of consideration (n=2). Among those with MRI overreads 44.7% (17/39) were found to have findings that negatively impacted eligibility for FT like lesion crossing anteriorly to the urethra occurred in (9/17), multifocal disease (8/17), discordance of lesion on prior MRI (3/17) and lesion abutting rectal wall (1/17). Pathology re-review changed management for 3/11 patients with 2/3 being downgraded to GG1 disease and opting for active surveillance. Following multidisciplinary tumor boards, twelve patients (26.7%) were deemed candidates for FT. Conclusions: FTTB increases the selection scrutiny for FT candidates. MRI overreads are a meaningful part of FT tumor boards and can change candidacy based on new or meaningful findings. FTTB with prostate MR overreads should be considered as part of the selection process in FT decision making. [Table: see text]