Effectiveness and Safety of Bedaquiline-containing Regimens for Treatment on Patients With Refractory Rifampicin/multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in East China

Abstract Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing and bedaquiline-free regimens for treatment of patients with refractory rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB).Methods: Patients with refractory RR/MDR-TB receiving bedaquiline-containing regimens (bedaquiline group, n=102) and bedaquiline-free regimens (non-bedaquiline group, n=100) were included in this retrospective historical control study across East China. The culture conversion, end-of-treatment outcomes, cavity closing rate, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of treatment success and culture reversion.Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients were well balanced between the two groups. The culture conversion rates in the bedaquiline group at month 3 (89.2% vs. 66.0%), month 6 (90.2% vs. 72.0%), month 9 (91.2% vs. 66.0%), and month 12 (94.1% vs. 65.0%) were all significantly higher than those in the non-bedaquiline group (all p<0.001). Similar results were observed in the cavity closing rate at month 9 (19.6% vs. 8.0%, p=0.017) and month 12 (39.2% vs. 15.0%, p<0.001). Patients receiving bedaquiline-containing regimens had more treatment success than those receiving bedaquiline-free regimens (p<0.001; cure rate, 69.6% vs. 45.0%; complete the treatment, 22.5% vs. 18.0%; treatment success, 92.2% vs. 63.0%). The use of bedaquiline was identified as an independent predictor of both treatment success (OR=7.356, 95% CI: 2.920–18.530, p<0.001) and culture reversion (OR=0.124, 95% CI: 0.035–0.452, p<0.001). AEs were similarly reported in 26.5% of patients in the bedaquiline group and 19.0% in the non-bedaquiline group (p=0.206).Conclusions: Bedaquiline-containing regimens resulted in better treatment outcomes and similar safety relative to bedaquiline-free regimens for patients with refractory pulmonary RR/MDR-TB.