Risk Factor Analysis for Anastomotic Leakage after Lower Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Abstract Background We investigated the correlation between surgery-related factors and the incidence of leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) for lower rectal cancer. Methods A total of 630 patients underwent colorectal surgery between 2011 and 2014 in our department. Of these, 97 patients (15%) underwent LAR, and are the subjects of this retrospective study. Temporary ileostomy was performed for each patient.Results Anastomotic leakage occurred in 21 patients (21.7%). Univariate analysis showed that operative duration (p=0.0051), transanal hand-sewn anastomosis (p=0.0141), and operation procedure (p=0.0191) were significantly associated with the incidence of leakage. Multivariate analysis showed that underlying disease (p=0.044), transanal hand-sewn anastomosis (p=0.0188), and drain type (p=0.0251) were significantly associated with the incidence of leakage. The propensity score analysis results showed that closed drainage was associated with 6.3 times more postoperative blood loss (mls) in patients experiencing anastomotic leakage compared with open drainage, in the inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis.Conclusions Our results showed that underlying disease, transanal hand-sewn anastomosis, and the drain type may be risk factors for developing anastomotic leakage after LAR for lower rectal cancer. The notable finding was that the type of drainage was related to the incidence and volume of anastomotic leakage: open drainage was correlated with the incidence of leakage, and closed drainage was correlated with the volume of anastomotic leakage.