National Needs Assessment of Utilization of Common Newborn Clinical Decision Support Tools.

American journal of perinatology(2023)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) are common in neonatology, but utilization is rarely examined. We examined the utilization of four CDSTs in newborn care.   Study Design: A 72-field needs assessment was developed. It was distributed to listservs encompassing trainees, nurse practitioners, hospitalists, and attendings. At the conclusion of data collection, responses were downloaded and analyzed.        Results: We received 339 fully completed questionnaires. BiliTool and the EOS tool were used by > 90% of respondents, the BPD tool by 39%, and the EPB tool by 72%. Common reasons CDSTs did not impact clinical care included lack of electronic health record (EHR) integration, lack of confidence in prediction accuracy, and unhelpful predictions.   Conclusion: From a national sample of neonatal care providers, there is frequent but variable use of four CDSTs. Understanding the factors that contribute to tool utility is vital prior to development and implementation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
national needs assessment,newborn
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要