The importance of expert selection when identifying threatened ecosystems.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology(2023)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Identifying threatened ecosystem types is fundamental to conservation and management decision-making. When identification relies upon the judgment of suitably trained experts, decisions are vulnerable to inconsistent outcomes and can lack transparency. We elicited judgements of the occurrence of a widespread, critically endangered Australian ecosystem from a diverse pool of 83 experts. We asked: (1) How many experts are required to reliably conclude that the ecosystem is present? (2) How many experts are required to build a reliable model for predicting ecosystem presence? (3) Given expert selection can narrow the range opinions, if enough experts are selected, do selection strategies affect model predictions? (4) Does a diverse selection of experts provide better model predictions? We used power and sample size calculations with a finite population of 200 experts to calculate the number of experts required to reliably assess ecosystem presence in a theoretical scenario. We then used boosted regression trees to model expert elicitation of 122 plots based on real-world data. For a reliable consensus (90% probability of correctly identifying presence and absence), in a relatively certain scenario (85% probability of occurrence) we found at least 17 experts were required. More experts are required when occurrence was less certain; fewer if permissible error rates are relaxed. In comparison, only ∼20 experts were required for a reliable model that could predict for a range of scenarios. Expert selection strategies changed modelled outcomes, often overpredicting presence and underestimate uncertainty. However, smaller but diverse pools of experts produced similar outcomes to a model built from all contributing experts. Combining elicited judgements from a diverse pool of experts in a model-based decision support tool provides an efficient aggregation of a broad range of expertise. Such models can improve the transparency and consistency of conservation and management decision-making especially when ecosystems are defined by complex criteria. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
关键词
boosted regression trees, box gum woodland, critically endangered ecological community, endangered ecosystems, evidence-based management, expert elicitation, expert selection, structured expert judgement, arboles de regresion reforzada, bosques de boj, comunidad ecologica en peligro critico, consulta de expertos, ecosistema en peligro, juicio experto estructurado, manejo basado en evidencias, seleccion de expertos
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要