When to Combine Acetabular Osteotomy in Patients With Proximal Femoral Deformity Causing Residual Hip Dysplasia/Subluxation After Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Background: After the successful reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip, residual hip dysplasia may persist and lead to early osteoarthritis. Femoral and/or acetabular osteotomy has been used to address this problem. The purpose of this study is to determine the indication of femoral versus combined femoral-acetabular osteotomy in the management of residual hip dysplasia.Methods: Fifty-five patients with unilateral dislocated-type dysplasia of the hip, who had residual hip dysplasia after reduction, underwent femoral osteotomy with or without acetabular osteotomy before 8 years of age, and were followed for more than 2 years and over 8 years of age, were the subjects of this retrospective study. Twenty-eight patients underwent femoral osteotomy only at a median age of 34 months (group F), and 27 underwent combined femoral-Dega osteotomy at a median age of 49 months (group C). Seventeen patients in group F and 4 in group C had an additional osteotomy due to persistent hip dysplasia. Acetabular index (AI), lateral center-edge angle, and center-head distance difference were measured on serial radiographs. The z-value of AI (ZAI) was calculated. At the latest follow-up, patients in group F with Severin I/II who did not have an additional osteotomy were considered satisfactory, and patients with Severin III/IV or those who had an additional osteotomy were considered unsatisfactory. Preoperative variables were tested for the difference between satisfactory and unsatisfactory cases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to delineate a cutoff value of a significant parameter dividing the outcome.Results: AI and ZAI before index osteotomy were significant parameters predicting a satisfactory outcome in group F. Receiver operating characteristic analysis returned a cutoff value of ZAI 2.6 (Area Under the Curve=0.86, P=0.001). Eight of 12 cases (66.7%) with ZAI<2.6 in group F achieved a satisfactory outcome, whereas only 2 of 14 cases with ZAI >= 2.6 in group F did (P=0.02).Conclusion: ZAI 2.6 may serve as a threshold to combine acetabular osteotomy with femoral osteotomy in the management of residual hip dysplasia before 8 years of age.