Variability of [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection

Purpose(18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([F-18]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [F-18]FDG-PET/CT scans of suspected VGEI is challenging, reader dependent, and reporting standards are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability of [F-18]FDG-PET/low dose CT (LDCT) reporting of suspected VGEI using a proposed standard reporting format.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with a suspected VGEI (according to the MAGIC criteria) without need for urgent surgical treatment who underwent an additional [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT scan between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary referral centre. All [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT reports were scored following pre-selected criteria that were formulated based on literature and experts in the field. The aim was to investigate the completeness of [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT reports for diagnosing VGEI (proven according to the MAGIC criteria) and to evaluate if incompleteness of reports influenced the diagnostic accuracy.ResultsHundred-fifty-two patients were included. Median diagnostic interval from the index vascular surgical procedure until [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT scan was 35.5 (7.3-73.3) months. Grafts were in 65.1% located centrally and 34.9% peripherally. Based on the pre-selected reporting criteria, 45.7% of the reports included all items. The least frequently assessed criterion was FDG-uptake pattern (40.6%). Overall, [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 72%, and an accuracy of 88% when compared to the gold standard (diagnosed VGEI). Lower sensitivity and specificity in reports including & LE; 8 criteria compared to completely evaluated reports were found (83% and 50% vs. 92% and 77%, respectively).ConclusionLess than half of the [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT reports of suspected VGEI met all pre-selected criteria. Incompleteness of reports led to lower sensitivity and specificity. Implementing a recommendation with specific criteria for VGEI reporting is needed in the VGEI-guideline update. This study provides a first recommendation for a concise and complete [F-18]FDG-PET/LDCT report in patients with suspected VGEI.