Avoiding an unjust transition to sustainability: An equity metric for spatial conservation planning

The need for rapid and ambitious conservation and restoration is widely acknowledged, yet concern exists that the widespread reallocation of land to nature would disproportionately affect the world's poor. Conservation and restoration may limit nutrition and livelihood options and thus negatively affect social development objectives. Although much research looks into global -scale scenarios and planning of conservation and restoration, spatial evaluations of these trade -offs in terms of equity remain limited. We fill this gap by identifying areas where conservation or restoration under different future scenarios and prioritization maps expand nature into landscapes that likely support land- dependent communities in their local food security. By contrasting the expansion of nature into areas supporting land- dependent communities vs. places where the food system is supported by regional to global markets, we highlight the need for disaggregated indicators that reflect the diversity of human land -use needs in order to identify more equitable pathways. Conservation prioritizations were found to result in more equitable land -use outcomes than the land -use outcomes of widely used socioeconomic scenarios. Accounting for differentiated social impacts in model -based conservation and restoration planning and global scale scenario assessment can help achieve a more inclusive transition to sustainability as well as reduce barriers to meaningful change.