First-Side and Second-Side Repair of Bilateral Superior Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE:Bilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) may warrant surgeries on both sides. With repairs of unilateral SCD as reference, we investigate the comparative effectiveness of first-side and second-side repairs, in hopes of establishing knowledge that can guide clinical decision-making pertaining the appropriateness of second-side surgeries. METHODS:Middle fossa SCD repairs at an institution between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. Multivariable regression models assessed symptom resolution and audiometric improvement with surgery cohort (unilateral SCD repair vs. first-side repair vs. second-side repair) as the primary predictor. All models controlled for patient age, sex, surgery duration, prior ear surgery, and follow-up. RESULTS:A total of 407 repairs (180 unilateral SCD, 172 first-side, and 55 second-side repairs) were analyzed. The rates of overall symptom improvement for auditory and vestibular symptoms were as follows: 81% and 67% for unilateral SCD repairs; 73% and 54% for first-side repairs; and 43% and 51% for second-side repairs, respectively. Compared with first-side repairs, which resolved auditory symptoms at similar rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.36-1.07) but resolved vestibular symptoms at significantly lower rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.35-0.93) compared with unilateral SCD repairs, second-side repairs resolved auditory symptoms at significantly lower rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.10-0.51) but resolved vestibular symptoms at similar rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.45-2.01). CONCLUSIONS:Careful consideration of perioperative symptomatology may inform the appropriateness of second-side surgeries. If auditory symptoms persisted following first-side surgeries, second-side surgeries are less likely to yield resolution. If vestibular symptoms persisted following first-side repairs, second-side repairs may lead to resolution at similar rates as first-side repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3 Laryngoscope, 134:1882-1888, 2024.